Corporate environmental performance matters: an event study of the ecological and environmental code

Using an event-study approach, we examine the stock market response to the enactment of the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People’s Republic of China on 12 March 2026. For the full sample, we find a significant negative average market reaction to the enactment of the Code, reflecting market-wide concerns regarding rising compliance costs and regulatory pressure. Underlying this average negative reaction is a systematic screening effect: firms with strong environmental performance experience less negative stock returns, while those engaging in greenwashing are penalized more heavily. This screening effect is more pronounced among firms in environmentally sensitive industries, those included on the key pollution supervisory list, and firms that disclose quantitative information about adverse environmental impacts or issue standalone environmental reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics Letters
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2026.2752127
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate environmental performance matters: an event study of the ecological and environmental code

Weiqi Zhao, Zhanhong Lu, Guanghua Xu
Applied Economics Letters
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate environmental performance matters: an event study of the ecological and environmental code

Weiqi Zhao, Zhanhong Lu, Guanghua Xu
article en

Abstract

Using an event-study approach, we examine the stock market response to the enactment of the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People’s Republic of China on 12 March 2026. For the full sample, we find a significant negative average market reaction to the enactment of the Code, reflecting market-wide concerns regarding rising compliance costs and regulatory pressure. Underlying this average negative reaction is a systematic screening effect: firms with strong environmental performance experience less negative stock returns, while those engaging in greenwashing are penalized more heavily. This screening effect is more pronounced among firms in environmentally sensitive industries, those included on the key pollution supervisory list, and firms that disclose quantitative information about adverse environmental impacts or issue standalone environmental reports.

Applied Economics Letters
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon