Strategic mining on Sámi lands: Risks for Indigenous rights

Abstract This paper contributes to just transition debates, providing novel evidence about how emerging critical mineral governance plays out vis-à-vis state obligations to protect Sámi rights. Focus is on the designation of strategic extraction projects under the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act and the role of negotiated agreements between Sámi herding communities and mining companies. Using Swedish state-owned mining company LKAB’s proposed Per Geijer project on traditional Sámi lands as case study, we conduct a legal analysis drawing on Indigenous rights, specifically the state duty to seek and obtain free, prior and informed consent. Findings demonstrate inherent flaws in the strategic project mechanism and corporate breaches of international standards—with the agreement between LKAB and the herding community serving to contain criticism and distract from continued power imbalances. We argue that strategic mining projects perpetuate a colonial state–industry nexus with an urgent need to incorporate rigorous human rights safeguards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02499-4
Primary Topic
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic mining on Sámi lands: Risks for Indigenous rights

Rasmus Kløcker Larsen, Johanna Westeson, Carl Österlin, Annette Löf
AMBIO
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
article

Strategic mining on Sámi lands: Risks for Indigenous rights

Rasmus Kløcker Larsen, Johanna Westeson, Carl Österlin, Annette Löf
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper contributes to just transition debates, providing novel evidence about how emerging critical mineral governance plays out vis-à-vis state obligations to protect Sámi rights. Focus is on the designation of strategic extraction projects under the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act and the role of negotiated agreements between Sámi herding communities and mining companies. Using Swedish state-owned mining company LKAB’s proposed Per Geijer project on traditional Sámi lands as case study, we conduct a legal analysis drawing on Indigenous rights, specifically the state duty to seek and obtain free, prior and informed consent. Findings demonstrate inherent flaws in the strategic project mechanism and corporate breaches of international standards—with the agreement between LKAB and the herding community serving to contain criticism and distract from continued power imbalances. We argue that strategic mining projects perpetuate a colonial state–industry nexus with an urgent need to incorporate rigorous human rights safeguards.

AMBIO
Stockholm Environment Institute (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon