Eyes-free map learning: comparing cognitive map development from visual and nonvisual digital maps

Although spatial learning is traditionally visual, nonvisual senses can convey similar information. This study investigated whether visual and nonvisual map learning produce functionally equivalent cognitive maps in sighted individuals. Thirty adults learned three information-matched maps using haptic, auditory, and visual modalities before completing egocentric wayfinding and allocentric map re-creation tasks. Results showed that nonvisual learning supported accurate performance statistically similar to visual learning on all measures, with a preference for haptic maps. However, visual learning generally produced small but reliable performance advantages. These findings support growing evidence that visual and nonvisual spatial learning can produce similar mental representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2026.2750883
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eyes-free map learning: comparing cognitive map development from visual and nonvisual digital maps

Nicholas A. Giudice, Kyle J James, Justin R. Brown, Karalyn M. Kutzer et al.
Spatial Cognition and Computation
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Eyes-free map learning: comparing cognitive map development from visual and nonvisual digital maps

Nicholas A. Giudice, Kyle J James, Justin R. Brown, Karalyn M. Kutzer, Arnav R. Varyani, Hari P. Palani
article en

Abstract

Although spatial learning is traditionally visual, nonvisual senses can convey similar information. This study investigated whether visual and nonvisual map learning produce functionally equivalent cognitive maps in sighted individuals. Thirty adults learned three information-matched maps using haptic, auditory, and visual modalities before completing egocentric wayfinding and allocentric map re-creation tasks. Results showed that nonvisual learning supported accurate performance statistically similar to visual learning on all measures, with a preference for haptic maps. However, visual learning generally produced small but reliable performance advantages. These findings support growing evidence that visual and nonvisual spatial learning can produce similar mental representations.

Spatial Cognition and Computation
Northeastern University (US), University of Maine (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon