Specific features of rendering humor-generating devices in the Russian translation of American sitcoms

The study aims to identify the specific features of rendering humor-generating devices when translating American sitcoms into Russian. The analysis considers not only the structural, semantic, and functional characteristics of linguistic devices – lexical and phonetic – and the cultural context against which they operate, but also the non-verbal elements that interact with verbal content. This interaction is essential to achieving an adequate audiovisual translation. The scientific novelty lies in identifying stable correlations between humor-generating devices operating at different linguistic levels in audiovisual works and the dominant translation techniques used to render them. The findings indicate that rhyme is most often translated through compensation; onomatopoeia is typically rendered using established equivalents or lexical substitution; and the dominant techniques for translating nonce words and wordplay are calque and compensation, respectively. The choice of translation technique is shaped by the audiovisual context, since verbal elements do not function independently but are inseparably connected with image and sound.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philology Theory & Practice
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20260499
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specific features of rendering humor-generating devices in the Russian translation of American sitcoms

Кириллова Юлия Николаевна
Philology Theory & Practice
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Specific features of rendering humor-generating devices in the Russian translation of American sitcoms

Кириллова Юлия Николаевна
article en

Abstract

The study aims to identify the specific features of rendering humor-generating devices when translating American sitcoms into Russian. The analysis considers not only the structural, semantic, and functional characteristics of linguistic devices – lexical and phonetic – and the cultural context against which they operate, but also the non-verbal elements that interact with verbal content. This interaction is essential to achieving an adequate audiovisual translation. The scientific novelty lies in identifying stable correlations between humor-generating devices operating at different linguistic levels in audiovisual works and the dominant translation techniques used to render them. The findings indicate that rhyme is most often translated through compensation; onomatopoeia is typically rendered using established equivalents or lexical substitution; and the dominant techniques for translating nonce words and wordplay are calque and compensation, respectively. The choice of translation technique is shaped by the audiovisual context, since verbal elements do not function independently but are inseparably connected with image and sound.

Philology Theory & PracticeVol. 19(10)
Altai State Pedagogical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon