Problems of Prosecutor's Oversight in the Sphere of Youth Extremism Prevention

The article is devoted to the analysis of current problems of prosecutorial supervision over the enforcement of legislation on the prevention of extremism among youth, taking into account the fundamental changes in the regulatory framework of 2024–2026. The aim of the study is to identify regulatory gaps, procedural and organizational difficulties impeding the effective exercise of prosecutorial powers, and to propose specific mechanisms for their elimination. The scientific significance is determined by the comprehensive nature of the analysis: it examines legal collisions in defining the prosecutor's office as a subject of extremism prevention, the institution of extrajudicial blocking of extremist content, supervisory challenges in countering new forms of youth radicalization (school shooting, destructive subcultures), as well as the potential of the Comprehensive Measures for 2026–2030. The practical significance consists in the substantiation of specific proposals for improving legal regulation. The novelty is expressed in the systematization of supervisory practice problems based on the updated Strategy for Countering Extremism of 2024 and the statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for 2025 – the first half of 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67931/1998-5533-2026-3-260-264
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of Prosecutor's Oversight in the Sphere of Youth Extremism Prevention

A. K. Shakaryan, O. V. Shlyapnikova
1 links
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Problems of Prosecutor's Oversight in the Sphere of Youth Extremism Prevention

A. K. Shakaryan, O. V. Shlyapnikova
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of current problems of prosecutorial supervision over the enforcement of legislation on the prevention of extremism among youth, taking into account the fundamental changes in the regulatory framework of 2024–2026. The aim of the study is to identify regulatory gaps, procedural and organizational difficulties impeding the effective exercise of prosecutorial powers, and to propose specific mechanisms for their elimination. The scientific significance is determined by the comprehensive nature of the analysis: it examines legal collisions in defining the prosecutor's office as a subject of extremism prevention, the institution of extrajudicial blocking of extremist content, supervisory challenges in countering new forms of youth radicalization (school shooting, destructive subcultures), as well as the potential of the Comprehensive Measures for 2026–2030. The practical significance consists in the substantiation of specific proposals for improving legal regulation. The novelty is expressed in the systematization of supervisory practice problems based on the updated Strategy for Countering Extremism of 2024 and the statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for 2025 – the first half of 2026.

(3)
Saratov State Academy of Law (RU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Problems of Prosecutor's Oversight in the Sphere of Youth Extremism Prevention — A. K. Shakaryan, O. V. Shlyapnikova · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS