Herbal Topical Formulations for Wound Healing: Phytoconstituents, Formulation Strategies and Evidence-Based Evaluation

Wound healing is a coordinated biological process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodelling. Delayed repair can be associated with infection, persistent inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired perfusion, metabolic disease, and other patient- and wound-related factors. Medicinal plants contain chemically diverse constituents—including flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, terpenoids, saponins, and polysaccharides—that have been investigated for possible effects on processes involved in tissue repair. However, the value of a botanical ingredient depends not only on preliminary biological activity but also on reliable botanical identification, chemical characterization, formulation performance, stability, local safety, and the quality of supporting evidence. This critical review connects phytochemical considerations with topical dosage-form design and evidence-based evaluation. Conventional gels, creams, ointments, emulgels, films, hydrogels, and selected nano-enabled systems are compared in terms of potential advantages, limitations, and development needs. Analytical and biological methods—including marker-based standardization, chromatographic fingerprinting, release testing, antimicrobial assays, cell-based models, preclinical wound models, and clinical outcomes—are discussed with attention to what each method can and cannot establish. Clinical reviews suggest that several botanical interventions merit further investigation, but heterogeneity in products, indications, controls, and study quality limits broad conclusions. The review proposes a botanical-to-clinical evidence framework that links identity and chemical quality to formulation performance, biological plausibility, safety, and clinically meaningful outcomes. This framework is intended to improve reproducibility and help distinguish promising experimental observations from established therapeutic benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23762084
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Herbal Topical Formulations for Wound Healing: Phytoconstituents, Formulation Strategies and Evidence-Based Evaluation

Vinod Kumar Maurya, Chandresh Maurya*, Rohit Singh, Pratik Kumar Vishwkarma et al.
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Herbal Topical Formulations for Wound Healing: Phytoconstituents, Formulation Strategies and Evidence-Based Evaluation

Vinod Kumar Maurya, Chandresh Maurya*, Rohit Singh, Pratik Kumar Vishwkarma, Pooja Kumari
article en

Abstract

Wound healing is a coordinated biological process involving hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodelling. Delayed repair can be associated with infection, persistent inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired perfusion, metabolic disease, and other patient- and wound-related factors. Medicinal plants contain chemically diverse constituents—including flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, terpenoids, saponins, and polysaccharides—that have been investigated for possible effects on processes involved in tissue repair. However, the value of a botanical ingredient depends not only on preliminary biological activity but also on reliable botanical identification, chemical characterization, formulation performance, stability, local safety, and the quality of supporting evidence. This critical review connects phytochemical considerations with topical dosage-form design and evidence-based evaluation. Conventional gels, creams, ointments, emulgels, films, hydrogels, and selected nano-enabled systems are compared in terms of potential advantages, limitations, and development needs. Analytical and biological methods—including marker-based standardization, chromatographic fingerprinting, release testing, antimicrobial assays, cell-based models, preclinical wound models, and clinical outcomes—are discussed with attention to what each method can and cannot establish. Clinical reviews suggest that several botanical interventions merit further investigation, but heterogeneity in products, indications, controls, and study quality limits broad conclusions. The review proposes a botanical-to-clinical evidence framework that links identity and chemical quality to formulation performance, biological plausibility, safety, and clinically meaningful outcomes. This framework is intended to improve reproducibility and help distinguish promising experimental observations from established therapeutic benefit.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government of Uttar Pradesh (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon