Trade-Offs in Authoritarian Participatory Digital Surveillance: Evidence From China’s Sharp Eyes Project

How do authoritarian regimes overcome the limits of digital surveillance? They complement camera systems with citizen monitoring and reporting, creating participatory surveillance in which residents interpret what cameras capture and supply local knowledge technology alone cannot provide. I study this hybrid form of control in China’s Sharp Eyes Project, which gives selected residents access to camera feeds and encourages reports of suspected misconduct. I use a staggered difference-in-differences analysis of administrative and survey data from Chinese cities. The program increases citizen reporting by 11%, reduces crimes susceptible to community monitoring, and lowers trust in neighbors. Reports expand the state’s informational reach, but the system makes residents uncertain about how neighbors may interpret and report their behavior. The study places political participation at the center of digital surveillance and shows how authoritarian regimes turn relations among citizens into a source of state power while weakening the foundations of collective action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140261500258
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-Offs in Authoritarian Participatory Digital Surveillance: Evidence From China’s Sharp Eyes Project

Ziwen Zu
4 links
Comparative Political Studies
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Trade-Offs in Authoritarian Participatory Digital Surveillance: Evidence From China’s Sharp Eyes Project

Ziwen Zu
article en

Abstract

How do authoritarian regimes overcome the limits of digital surveillance? They complement camera systems with citizen monitoring and reporting, creating participatory surveillance in which residents interpret what cameras capture and supply local knowledge technology alone cannot provide. I study this hybrid form of control in China’s Sharp Eyes Project, which gives selected residents access to camera feeds and encourages reports of suspected misconduct. I use a staggered difference-in-differences analysis of administrative and survey data from Chinese cities. The program increases citizen reporting by 11%, reduces crimes susceptible to community monitoring, and lowers trust in neighbors. Reports expand the state’s informational reach, but the system makes residents uncertain about how neighbors may interpret and report their behavior. The study places political participation at the center of digital surveillance and shows how authoritarian regimes turn relations among citizens into a source of state power while weakening the foundations of collective action.

Comparative Political Studies
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
American Political Science Association, University of California, San Diego
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Trade-Offs in Authoritarian Participatory Digital Surveillance: Evidence From China’s Sharp Eyes Project — Ziwen Zu · Comparative Political Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS