Barriers and Facilitators to Using Campus-Based Mental Health Services: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of University Students in Astana, Kazakhstan

Background/Objectives: The mental health difficulties of youth in Central Asia are of increasing concern. This exploratory qualitative study explores university students’ accounts of barriers to and facilitators of using campus-based mental health services, their perceptions of accessibility and quality, and their suggestions for service improvement. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 undergraduate students who responded to open invitations and studied at five universities (two private and three public) in Astana, Kazakhstan. Participants fell into three mutually exclusive groups: students who had used campus services (n = 6), students who had attempted to use them but did not receive a service (n = 2), and students who were aware of the services but had never attempted to use them (n = 3). The data were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis with a hybrid deductive–inductive approach. Results: Five themes were developed: personal triggers for seeking help; accessibility and institutional barriers; cultural and societal influences; experiences of service quality; and participants’ suggestions for improvement. Participants described experienced barriers (e.g., appointment delays, restricted opening hours and phone-only booking), perceived barriers (e.g., limited visibility of services and predominantly Russian-language provision) and anticipated barriers (e.g., family stigma and fear of psychiatric registration). Assessments of service quality came primarily from the six service users and centered on transparency about counsellors’ approaches and on session length. Participants suggested increasing service visibility, offering more flexible booking and opening hours, providing information about counsellors’ qualifications and approaches, offering support in more than one language, and reducing stigma through culturally sensitive education. Conclusions: Strengthening campus mental health services requires addressing institutional and sociocultural barriers to help-seeking. These findings are exploratory and specific to the studied context. Therefore, further research across diverse settings is needed to explore the transferability of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213674
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and Facilitators to Using Campus-Based Mental Health Services: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of University Students in Astana, Kazakhstan

Maiya Taushanova, Kuanysh A. Yergaliyev, Daniel Cavanagh, Yerbol Nurkatov et al.
2 links
Healthcare
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Barriers and Facilitators to Using Campus-Based Mental Health Services: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of University Students in Astana, Kazakhstan

Maiya Taushanova, Kuanysh A. Yergaliyev, Daniel Cavanagh, Yerbol Nurkatov, Indira Seitimova
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The mental health difficulties of youth in Central Asia are of increasing concern. This exploratory qualitative study explores university students’ accounts of barriers to and facilitators of using campus-based mental health services, their perceptions of accessibility and quality, and their suggestions for service improvement. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 undergraduate students who responded to open invitations and studied at five universities (two private and three public) in Astana, Kazakhstan. Participants fell into three mutually exclusive groups: students who had used campus services (n = 6), students who had attempted to use them but did not receive a service (n = 2), and students who were aware of the services but had never attempted to use them (n = 3). The data were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis with a hybrid deductive–inductive approach. Results: Five themes were developed: personal triggers for seeking help; accessibility and institutional barriers; cultural and societal influences; experiences of service quality; and participants’ suggestions for improvement. Participants described experienced barriers (e.g., appointment delays, restricted opening hours and phone-only booking), perceived barriers (e.g., limited visibility of services and predominantly Russian-language provision) and anticipated barriers (e.g., family stigma and fear of psychiatric registration). Assessments of service quality came primarily from the six service users and centered on transparency about counsellors’ approaches and on session length. Participants suggested increasing service visibility, offering more flexible booking and opening hours, providing information about counsellors’ qualifications and approaches, offering support in more than one language, and reducing stigma through culturally sensitive education. Conclusions: Strengthening campus mental health services requires addressing institutional and sociocultural barriers to help-seeking. These findings are exploratory and specific to the studied context. Therefore, further research across diverse settings is needed to explore the transferability of these findings.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Suleyman Demirel University (KZ), West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University (KZ), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon