Dimensionality Reduction of Full-Body Strength-Power Metrics to Identify Distinct Strength Domains in Elite Rugby Union Athletes

ABSTRACT: Payne, LKD, Varley, MC, Carey, DL, Driller, MW, and James, LP. Dimensionality reduction of full-body strength-power metrics to identify distinct strength domains in elite rugby union athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aim of this study was to determine the extent of shared and unique information among strength tests and to evaluate whether factors identified through exploratory factor analysis reflect distinct strength domains in professional rugby union players. Twenty professional male rugby union athletes (age 24.4 ± 3.8 years; height 186.3 ± 5.2 cm; body mass 107.6 ± 10.9 kg) completed a battery of 4 upper-body and 5 lower-body isometric, dynamic, and reactive strength tests. A total of 18 metrics were entered into exploratory factor analysis to identify distinct strength domains. Exploratory factor analysis reduced the data set into 2 upper-body domains (pressing and pulling) and 4 lower-body domains (isometric, dynamic, reactive, and relative). These domains together explained 73% of the variance in the upper-body data and 79% of the variance in the lower-body data. The isometric domain was driven by early-phase force at 100 and 200 ms, while peak force contributed less strongly. The dynamic domain was defined by heavy squat velocity, which diverged inversely from countermovement jump height, reflecting load-velocity differences. The reactive domain was shaped by contact time and countermovement depth, highlighting the role of temporal mechanics. The relative domain was defined by drop jump height and countermovement jump momentum, emphasizing the influence of body mass on ballistic force expression. Eighteen test metrics were successfully reduced to 6 distinct domains of strength in professional rugby union athletes. This framework provides a concise basis for profiling upper-body and lower-body strength to reduce redundancy and retain key information needed for training and monitoring rugby athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005712
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dimensionality Reduction of Full-Body Strength-Power Metrics to Identify Distinct Strength Domains in Elite Rugby Union Athletes

Matthew C. Varley, Matthew William Driller, David L. Carey, Lachlan P. James et al.
4 links
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Dimensionality Reduction of Full-Body Strength-Power Metrics to Identify Distinct Strength Domains in Elite Rugby Union Athletes

Matthew C. Varley, Matthew William Driller, David L. Carey, Lachlan P. James, Leslie K D Payne
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Payne, LKD, Varley, MC, Carey, DL, Driller, MW, and James, LP. Dimensionality reduction of full-body strength-power metrics to identify distinct strength domains in elite rugby union athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aim of this study was to determine the extent of shared and unique information among strength tests and to evaluate whether factors identified through exploratory factor analysis reflect distinct strength domains in professional rugby union players. Twenty professional male rugby union athletes (age 24.4 ± 3.8 years; height 186.3 ± 5.2 cm; body mass 107.6 ± 10.9 kg) completed a battery of 4 upper-body and 5 lower-body isometric, dynamic, and reactive strength tests. A total of 18 metrics were entered into exploratory factor analysis to identify distinct strength domains. Exploratory factor analysis reduced the data set into 2 upper-body domains (pressing and pulling) and 4 lower-body domains (isometric, dynamic, reactive, and relative). These domains together explained 73% of the variance in the upper-body data and 79% of the variance in the lower-body data. The isometric domain was driven by early-phase force at 100 and 200 ms, while peak force contributed less strongly. The dynamic domain was defined by heavy squat velocity, which diverged inversely from countermovement jump height, reflecting load-velocity differences. The reactive domain was shaped by contact time and countermovement depth, highlighting the role of temporal mechanics. The relative domain was defined by drop jump height and countermovement jump momentum, emphasizing the influence of body mass on ballistic force expression. Eighteen test metrics were successfully reduced to 6 distinct domains of strength in professional rugby union athletes. This framework provides a concise basis for profiling upper-body and lower-body strength to reduce redundancy and retain key information needed for training and monitoring rugby athletes.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
La Trobe University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon