Necroptosis in cancer therapy: bridging radiotherapy, tumor immunity, and treatment resistance

Necroptosis occupies an unresolved paradox in cancer biology: the same RIPK1–RIPK3–MLKL-driven, caspase-independent death program can either prime potent antitumor immunity or fuel the chronic inflammation that drives tumor growth, and the field has lacked a framework for predicting which outcome a given tumor will produce. This review addresses that gap by synthesizing evidence across more than a dozen tumor models into five variables that govern the balance, the acuity and context of induction, the specific downstream mediator engaged, host immune competence, tumor genetic background, and dependence on RIPK3 itself, and maps the existing literature against them in a dedicated comparative table. Radiotherapy emerges as a uniquely tractable setting for exploiting this duality: in several tumor models, irradiation activates RIPK1–RIPK3–MLKL or ZBP1–MLKL signaling that caspase-8 normally restrains, engaging cGAS–STING–type I interferon signaling, dendritic-cell cross-priming, and CD8⁺ T-cell responses, with efficiency shaped directly by radiation dose and fractionation; in other models, the same signaling instead drives IL-8-mediated tumor repopulation. We further show that pharmacologically restoring silenced RIPK3 or MLKL, a common strategy for re-sensitizing resistant tumors, is often insufficient on its own, since parallel resistance mechanisms such as compensatory ADAR1 upregulation can independently block the pathway even after successful epigenetic reversal. Clinical translation remains constrained by the absence of a validated necroptosis biomarker, though emerging circulating markers and trial data on the sequencing of checkpoint blockade relative to radiotherapy offer concrete starting points. By reframing necroptosis not as a generic form of cell death but as a mechanistic hub linking radiotherapy, immune sensing, and therapeutic resistance, this review provides a structured, actionable basis for the combination therapies needed to harness this pathway safely in the clinic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Biology and Toxicology
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-026-10319-4
Primary Topic
Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Necroptosis in cancer therapy: bridging radiotherapy, tumor immunity, and treatment resistance

Hosein Azimian, Seyedeh Nasibeh Mousavikia, Elham Khakshour, Saba Ordibeheshti et al.
1 links
Cell Biology and Toxicology
Cell death mechanisms and regulation
article

Necroptosis in cancer therapy: bridging radiotherapy, tumor immunity, and treatment resistance

Hosein Azimian, Seyedeh Nasibeh Mousavikia, Elham Khakshour, Saba Ordibeheshti, Mohammad Sobhan Mokhtari Zamenjani
article en

Abstract

Necroptosis occupies an unresolved paradox in cancer biology: the same RIPK1–RIPK3–MLKL-driven, caspase-independent death program can either prime potent antitumor immunity or fuel the chronic inflammation that drives tumor growth, and the field has lacked a framework for predicting which outcome a given tumor will produce. This review addresses that gap by synthesizing evidence across more than a dozen tumor models into five variables that govern the balance, the acuity and context of induction, the specific downstream mediator engaged, host immune competence, tumor genetic background, and dependence on RIPK3 itself, and maps the existing literature against them in a dedicated comparative table. Radiotherapy emerges as a uniquely tractable setting for exploiting this duality: in several tumor models, irradiation activates RIPK1–RIPK3–MLKL or ZBP1–MLKL signaling that caspase-8 normally restrains, engaging cGAS–STING–type I interferon signaling, dendritic-cell cross-priming, and CD8⁺ T-cell responses, with efficiency shaped directly by radiation dose and fractionation; in other models, the same signaling instead drives IL-8-mediated tumor repopulation. We further show that pharmacologically restoring silenced RIPK3 or MLKL, a common strategy for re-sensitizing resistant tumors, is often insufficient on its own, since parallel resistance mechanisms such as compensatory ADAR1 upregulation can independently block the pathway even after successful epigenetic reversal. Clinical translation remains constrained by the absence of a validated necroptosis biomarker, though emerging circulating markers and trial data on the sequencing of checkpoint blockade relative to radiotherapy offer concrete starting points. By reframing necroptosis not as a generic form of cell death but as a mechanistic hub linking radiotherapy, immune sensing, and therapeutic resistance, this review provides a structured, actionable basis for the combination therapies needed to harness this pathway safely in the clinic.

Cell Biology and Toxicology
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cell death mechanisms and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon