Safety and efficacy of port use for CAR T-cell infusion in large B-cell lymphoma

Current guidelines recommend the use of multi-lumen central venous access for the infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) [ 1 , 2 ]. While options include placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), central venous catheter (CVC), or implanted venous access via a port-a-cath [ 1 ], PICC use is predominant [ 2 , 3 ], mainly due to hypothetical concern for potential deleterious effects of shear stress enacted on CAR T-cells when infused through the angled port Huber needle, as these cells may be more susceptible to mechanical stresses [ 4 , 5 ]. However, there is no current data to support this practice. Investigating this question is clinically relevant, because most patients may already have a port due to prior systemic therapies, and the addition of a PICC line and possible removal of the port frequently represents an inconvenience for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01654-0
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of port use for CAR T-cell infusion in large B-cell lymphoma

Zachary Hunzeker, Taylor Cain, Minifrida Santiago, Jeremy Ramdial et al.
Blood Cancer Journal
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Safety and efficacy of port use for CAR T-cell infusion in large B-cell lymphoma

Zachary Hunzeker, Taylor Cain, Minifrida Santiago, Jeremy Ramdial, Paolo Strati, Sairah Ahmed, Jaimole Varghese, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Lei Feng, Amy A. Ayers, Sattva Swarup Neelapu, Anath Christopher Lionel, Xiaowen Sun, Sreekala Nair, Michelly De Castro, Karla Ow
article en

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend the use of multi-lumen central venous access for the infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) [ 1 , 2 ]. While options include placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), central venous catheter (CVC), or implanted venous access via a port-a-cath [ 1 ], PICC use is predominant [ 2 , 3 ], mainly due to hypothetical concern for potential deleterious effects of shear stress enacted on CAR T-cells when infused through the angled port Huber needle, as these cells may be more susceptible to mechanical stresses [ 4 , 5 ]. However, there is no current data to support this practice. Investigating this question is clinically relevant, because most patients may already have a port due to prior systemic therapies, and the addition of a PICC line and possible removal of the port frequently represents an inconvenience for these patients.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 16(1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon