Complete-Perforation Response of Hybrid Flax/Aramid–Epoxy Laminates Manufactured by Different Routes and Strike-Face Configurations

This study compares the complete-perforation response of flax/aramid–epoxy laminates manufactured with a fixed nominal 12-layer hybrid architecture while varying the manufacturing route and the reinforcement placed at the strike face. Laminates containing six flax and six aramid bidirectional fabric layers arranged in alternating two-layer blocks were produced by manual compression molding or vacuum-assisted hand lay-up and impacted with 9 mm full-metal-jacket projectiles. Five impacts were performed on one panel for each of four configurations; the shots were therefore treated as repeated observations within each panel rather than independent manufacturing replicates. Mean residual velocities ranged from 353.4 to 361.2 m/s, while mean projectile kinetic-energy losses ranged from 213.3 to 237.8 J. The VL panel (vacuum processed, flax strike face) showed the lowest mean residual velocity (353.4 m/s), whereas PA (compression molded, aramid strike face) showed the highest mean projectile kinetic-energy loss (237.8 J), closely followed by VL (236.0 J). Using the measured full-panel masses, mean SEA ranged from 0.970 kJ kg−1 for PA to 1.128 kJ kg−1 for VL. Post-impact inspection showed configuration-dependent visible surface-damage morphologies and projected damage-envelope areas; microscopic failure modes and internal delamination were not measured and are therefore not assigned from the photographs alone. Because every projectile completely perforated the targets, no experimental ballistic-limit velocity (V50) was determined. The results are presented as a descriptive, configuration-resolved comparison of the tested panels; independent panel replication is required for population-level inference on manufacturing-route and strike-face effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10110579
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complete-Perforation Response of Hybrid Flax/Aramid–Epoxy Laminates Manufactured by Different Routes and Strike-Face Configurations

Lucas de Mendonça Neuba, Sérgio Neves Monteiro, Belayne Zanini Marchi, Thomaz Jacintho Lopes et al.
Journal of Composites Science
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Complete-Perforation Response of Hybrid Flax/Aramid–Epoxy Laminates Manufactured by Different Routes and Strike-Face Configurations

Lucas de Mendonça Neuba, Sérgio Neves Monteiro, Belayne Zanini Marchi, Thomaz Jacintho Lopes, Douglas Santos Silva, Raí Felipe Pereira Junio
article en

Abstract

This study compares the complete-perforation response of flax/aramid–epoxy laminates manufactured with a fixed nominal 12-layer hybrid architecture while varying the manufacturing route and the reinforcement placed at the strike face. Laminates containing six flax and six aramid bidirectional fabric layers arranged in alternating two-layer blocks were produced by manual compression molding or vacuum-assisted hand lay-up and impacted with 9 mm full-metal-jacket projectiles. Five impacts were performed on one panel for each of four configurations; the shots were therefore treated as repeated observations within each panel rather than independent manufacturing replicates. Mean residual velocities ranged from 353.4 to 361.2 m/s, while mean projectile kinetic-energy losses ranged from 213.3 to 237.8 J. The VL panel (vacuum processed, flax strike face) showed the lowest mean residual velocity (353.4 m/s), whereas PA (compression molded, aramid strike face) showed the highest mean projectile kinetic-energy loss (237.8 J), closely followed by VL (236.0 J). Using the measured full-panel masses, mean SEA ranged from 0.970 kJ kg−1 for PA to 1.128 kJ kg−1 for VL. Post-impact inspection showed configuration-dependent visible surface-damage morphologies and projected damage-envelope areas; microscopic failure modes and internal delamination were not measured and are therefore not assigned from the photographs alone. Because every projectile completely perforated the targets, no experimental ballistic-limit velocity (V50) was determined. The results are presented as a descriptive, configuration-resolved comparison of the tested panels; independent panel replication is required for population-level inference on manufacturing-route and strike-face effects.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 10(11)
Military Institute of Engineering (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon