Feeding decisions in advanced dementia: beliefs of caregivers and nursing technicians in a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the beliefs and perceptions of caregivers regarding feeding management in patients with advanced dementia at one of the largest female long-term care institution in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, exploratory study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire applied to caregivers and nursing technicians working at the institution. RESULTS: Among respondents, 78.7% believed that nasogastric tube feeding was the only therapeutic option for nutrition. Additionally, 70.2% considered oral comfort feeding to be an intervention that hastens death, and 85.1% believed that the absence of artificial nutrition would inevitably lead to death. Furthermore, 51.1% agreed that artificial feeding reduces the risk of aspiration, pressure injuries, and hospitalizations, as well as providing comfort and prolonging life, despite the lack of supporting evidence in the scientific literature. Notably, 66% of participants reported having received prior training on feeding management in advanced dementia. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight inconsistencies between the perceptions of caregivers and nursing technicians and evidence-based practices regarding feeding in advanced dementia. There is a clear need for targeted education and continuous training programs to promote informed decision-making and support evidence-informed care for this vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geriatric Nursing
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.104395
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding decisions in advanced dementia: beliefs of caregivers and nursing technicians in a cross-sectional study

Kelly Carvalho Silveira Gonçalves, CAROLLYNA SCHERER BRUM, LAURA ROSSI DA MOTTA, Beatriz Passinho Heinle
1 links
Geriatric Nursing
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Feeding decisions in advanced dementia: beliefs of caregivers and nursing technicians in a cross-sectional study

Kelly Carvalho Silveira Gonçalves, CAROLLYNA SCHERER BRUM, LAURA ROSSI DA MOTTA, Beatriz Passinho Heinle
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the beliefs and perceptions of caregivers regarding feeding management in patients with advanced dementia at one of the largest female long-term care institution in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, exploratory study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire applied to caregivers and nursing technicians working at the institution. RESULTS: Among respondents, 78.7% believed that nasogastric tube feeding was the only therapeutic option for nutrition. Additionally, 70.2% considered oral comfort feeding to be an intervention that hastens death, and 85.1% believed that the absence of artificial nutrition would inevitably lead to death. Furthermore, 51.1% agreed that artificial feeding reduces the risk of aspiration, pressure injuries, and hospitalizations, as well as providing comfort and prolonging life, despite the lack of supporting evidence in the scientific literature. Notably, 66% of participants reported having received prior training on feeding management in advanced dementia. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight inconsistencies between the perceptions of caregivers and nursing technicians and evidence-based practices regarding feeding in advanced dementia. There is a clear need for targeted education and continuous training programs to promote informed decision-making and support evidence-informed care for this vulnerable population.

Geriatric NursingVol. 74(Pt B)
Universidade Franciscana (BR), Franciscan University (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon