Flexibility at a cost? Required price reductions in dynamic EV charging tariffs

Congestion at charging stations causes uneven infrastructure utilization and restricts user mobility, potentially slowing battery electric vehicle adoption. This study examines how dynamic pricing can make users more flexible in when, where, and how long they charge. Using a survey-based experiment, we quantify the price reductions needed to induce each type of flexibility. Among consistently price-responsive respondents, average required reductions were 23.8% for charging 1 km farther away, 24.5% for shifting from daytime to nighttime, and 29.7% for accepting doubled charging duration. Responsiveness varied with battery electric vehicle charging experience, mobility patterns, and socio-demographic characteristics. By testing a broad range of price incentives in a survey-based experiment, this study complements field experiment evidence and informs the design of targeted dynamic pricing schemes that improve charging infrastructure utilization while accounting for heterogeneous user preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105697
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexibility at a cost? Required price reductions in dynamic EV charging tariffs

Ayse Tugba Atasoy, Reinhard Madlener, Paul Fabianek
1 links
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Flexibility at a cost? Required price reductions in dynamic EV charging tariffs

Ayse Tugba Atasoy, Reinhard Madlener, Paul Fabianek
article en

Abstract

Congestion at charging stations causes uneven infrastructure utilization and restricts user mobility, potentially slowing battery electric vehicle adoption. This study examines how dynamic pricing can make users more flexible in when, where, and how long they charge. Using a survey-based experiment, we quantify the price reductions needed to induce each type of flexibility. Among consistently price-responsive respondents, average required reductions were 23.8% for charging 1 km farther away, 24.5% for shifting from daytime to nighttime, and 29.7% for accepting doubled charging duration. Responsiveness varied with battery electric vehicle charging experience, mobility patterns, and socio-demographic characteristics. By testing a broad range of price incentives in a survey-based experiment, this study complements field experiment evidence and informs the design of targeted dynamic pricing schemes that improve charging infrastructure utilization while accounting for heterogeneous user preferences.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 162
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Flexibility at a cost? Required price reductions in dynamic EV charging tariffs — Ayse Tugba Atasoy, Reinhard Madlener, et al. · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS