‘What Do We Do Next?’ Australian Carer Experiences of Recommendations in Neurodevelopmental Diagnostic Reports: A Qualitative Study Using the Framework Method

Diagnostic and developmental assessment reports communicate outcomes and recommendations for children with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs), supporting access to interventions, funding and educational accommodations. However, little is known about caregivers' perceptions of the clarity, usefulness and applicability of these recommendations. METHODS: This qualitative study explored caregiver experiences of recommendations following comprehensive developmental assessments at a publicly funded tertiary paediatric service in Sydney, Australia. Thirteen semi-structured interviews involving 14 caregivers of children aged 2-13 years were conducted between January and July 2025. Participants represented diverse cultural, linguistic and educational backgrounds. Interviews explored the clarity, usefulness and relevance of report recommendations. Data were analysed using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: quality of recommendations, practical considerations, access to funding, access to information and broader service-related issues. Caregivers generally described recommendations as clear, practical, comprehensive and consistent with verbal feedback. Reports supported disability funding applications, educational planning and communication with schools and service providers. Areas for improvement included more personalised, child-centred recommendations; clearer explanations of diagnostic terminology and funding pathways; greater detail about available services and practical implementation guidance. Caregivers also reported difficulties navigating funding systems, accessing services and prioritising recommendations alongside family demands. CONCLUSIONS: While recommendations were viewed positively overall, findings identified opportunities to improve relevance, accessibility and implementation. Child-centred recommendations, structured follow-up and care coordination may strengthen report impact and better support families to navigate services and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70633
Primary Topic
Family and Disability Support Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘What Do We Do Next?’ Australian Carer Experiences of Recommendations in Neurodevelopmental Diagnostic Reports: A Qualitative Study Using the Framework Method

Natalie Ong, Marie Antoinette Hodge, Adam John Guastella, Angela Papanicolaou et al.
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Family and Disability Support Research
article

‘What Do We Do Next?’ Australian Carer Experiences of Recommendations in Neurodevelopmental Diagnostic Reports: A Qualitative Study Using the Framework Method

Natalie Ong, Marie Antoinette Hodge, Adam John Guastella, Angela Papanicolaou, Natalie Silove, Kelsie Boulton, Rebecca Sutherland, Ruth Bowron
article en

Abstract

Diagnostic and developmental assessment reports communicate outcomes and recommendations for children with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs), supporting access to interventions, funding and educational accommodations. However, little is known about caregivers' perceptions of the clarity, usefulness and applicability of these recommendations. METHODS: This qualitative study explored caregiver experiences of recommendations following comprehensive developmental assessments at a publicly funded tertiary paediatric service in Sydney, Australia. Thirteen semi-structured interviews involving 14 caregivers of children aged 2-13 years were conducted between January and July 2025. Participants represented diverse cultural, linguistic and educational backgrounds. Interviews explored the clarity, usefulness and relevance of report recommendations. Data were analysed using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: quality of recommendations, practical considerations, access to funding, access to information and broader service-related issues. Caregivers generally described recommendations as clear, practical, comprehensive and consistent with verbal feedback. Reports supported disability funding applications, educational planning and communication with schools and service providers. Areas for improvement included more personalised, child-centred recommendations; clearer explanations of diagnostic terminology and funding pathways; greater detail about available services and practical implementation guidance. Caregivers also reported difficulties navigating funding systems, accessing services and prioritising recommendations alongside family demands. CONCLUSIONS: While recommendations were viewed positively overall, findings identified opportunities to improve relevance, accessibility and implementation. Child-centred recommendations, structured follow-up and care coordination may strengthen report impact and better support families to navigate services and interventions.

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
The University of Sydney (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU), Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Family and Disability Support Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon