Art Laboratory: Two Inverse Problems in Conservation Science

We apply a single inverse-problem framework to two problems in conservation science: the reconstruction of a Stradivari violin's thickness profile from its acoustic spectrum, and the detection of a hidden varnish layer in a painting from its XRF spectrum. The two cases yield opposite results. In the Stradivari case, no regularization scheme recovers the true profile from 20 modes: the inverse problem is structurally underdetermined, and the reconstruction is a homometric twin image. In the painting case, a model that ignores the varnish leaves a systematically structured residual, while a model that includes it does not; cross-validation of the two models detects the hidden layer even though the XRF measurement is depth-integrated. We conclude that the operator's failure is itself a diagnostic: it tells us whether the limit lies in the data (Stradivari) or in the model (painting). The Murphy Principle—cleanliness is not truth—holds in both cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23768504
Primary Topic
Numerical methods in inverse problems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Art Laboratory: Two Inverse Problems in Conservation Science

Petr Avtonomov
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Numerical methods in inverse problems
preprint

Art Laboratory: Two Inverse Problems in Conservation Science

Petr Avtonomov
preprint en

Abstract

We apply a single inverse-problem framework to two problems in conservation science: the reconstruction of a Stradivari violin's thickness profile from its acoustic spectrum, and the detection of a hidden varnish layer in a painting from its XRF spectrum. The two cases yield opposite results. In the Stradivari case, no regularization scheme recovers the true profile from 20 modes: the inverse problem is structurally underdetermined, and the reconstruction is a homometric twin image. In the painting case, a model that ignores the varnish leaves a systematically structured residual, while a model that includes it does not; cross-validation of the two models detects the hidden layer even though the XRF measurement is depth-integrated. We conclude that the operator's failure is itself a diagnostic: it tells us whether the limit lies in the data (Stradivari) or in the model (painting). The Murphy Principle—cleanliness is not truth—holds in both cases.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Numerical methods in inverse problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon