Sources of Risk in AI Systems Revisited: FCAIR-O, a Faceted Causal Framework and Lightweight Ontology for Risk Management and Assurance

Abstract Artificial-intelligence risk frameworks often combine causal sources, vulnerabilities, failure modes, harms, desired properties, controls, evidence, and legal classifications within the same lists. This role conflation obscures mechanisms, intervention points, and responsibility. As the conceptual successor to Steimers and Schneider (2022), this article retains intended purpose, reasonably foreseeable misuse, the protective-measure hierarchy, residual risk including control-induced risk, and post-market observation. It reassesses their eight-category taxonomy through a critical integrative conceptual synthesis supported by an access-limited evidence map, best-fit framework synthesis, legal and standards analysis, and an explicit design audit trail covering material available through 25 July 2026. The resulting Faceted Causal AI Risk and Assurance Ontology (FCAIR-O v1.2.1) is a conceptual framework implemented as a lightweight ontology and controlled concept scheme. It comprises a twelve-node causal and assurance backbone, eight orthogonal facets, twelve parent causal-source classes, and 74 operational causal leaves within 221 versioned concept identifiers. Five design-oriented theoretical propositions require ontological role separation, mechanistic traceability, multi-level causality, control-evidence coupling, and distinct normative and epistemic boundaries. Fairness, privacy, transparency, automation, complexity, security, hardware, and technological maturity are retained where useful but reassigned to causal, harm, property, control, evidence, or normative roles. A documentary reconstruction of the Uber Tempe fatality and additional cross-sector cases illustrate the framework without constituting empirical validation. FCAIR-O is offered as a revisable academic construct for risk-control-evidence records, assurance arguments, case analysis, and legal or sectoral overlays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11331305/v1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Sources of Risk in AI Systems Revisited: FCAIR-O, a Faceted Causal Framework and Lightweight Ontology for Risk Management and Assurance

André Steimers, Moritz Schneider
3 links
Research Square
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Sources of Risk in AI Systems Revisited: FCAIR-O, a Faceted Causal Framework and Lightweight Ontology for Risk Management and Assurance

André Steimers, Moritz Schneider
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial-intelligence risk frameworks often combine causal sources, vulnerabilities, failure modes, harms, desired properties, controls, evidence, and legal classifications within the same lists. This role conflation obscures mechanisms, intervention points, and responsibility. As the conceptual successor to Steimers and Schneider (2022), this article retains intended purpose, reasonably foreseeable misuse, the protective-measure hierarchy, residual risk including control-induced risk, and post-market observation. It reassesses their eight-category taxonomy through a critical integrative conceptual synthesis supported by an access-limited evidence map, best-fit framework synthesis, legal and standards analysis, and an explicit design audit trail covering material available through 25 July 2026. The resulting Faceted Causal AI Risk and Assurance Ontology (FCAIR-O v1.2.1) is a conceptual framework implemented as a lightweight ontology and controlled concept scheme. It comprises a twelve-node causal and assurance backbone, eight orthogonal facets, twelve parent causal-source classes, and 74 operational causal leaves within 221 versioned concept identifiers. Five design-oriented theoretical propositions require ontological role separation, mechanistic traceability, multi-level causality, control-evidence coupling, and distinct normative and epistemic boundaries. Fairness, privacy, transparency, automation, complexity, security, hardware, and technological maturity are retained where useful but reassigned to causal, harm, property, control, evidence, or normative roles. A documentary reconstruction of the Uber Tempe fatality and additional cross-sector cases illustrate the framework without constituting empirical validation. FCAIR-O is offered as a revisable academic construct for risk-control-evidence records, assurance arguments, case analysis, and legal or sectoral overlays.

Research Square
Koblenz University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Sources of Risk in AI Systems Revisited: FCAIR-O, a Faceted Causal Framework and Lightweight Ontology for Risk Management and Assurance — André Steimers, Moritz Schneider · Research Square (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS