Tool Errors: Measuring Safe Recovery from Ambiguous API Failures

An API error does not establish whether an operation took effect. Tool Errors measures safe recovery through stateful fault injection and replay-based scoring. Its 40 public episodes cover 6 fault families across 4 domains. We execute 4960 episodes using scripted controls and a simulated status-read omission sweep. The reference and response-aware controller each reach full credit on 40/40 tasks (95% Wilson interval 91.2-100.0%). Removing reads in a simulated ablation leaves 7/40 full-credit tasks (8.7-31.9%). At simulated read-omission probability 0.5, the mean full-credit fraction is 53.8% (50.6-56.9%, seed bootstrap). These are checks of the evaluation design, not trained-model results. No hosted model, human study, or production deployment is evaluated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23752435
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Tool Errors: Measuring Safe Recovery from Ambiguous API Failures

Pooria Arab
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software System Performance and Reliability
preprint

Tool Errors: Measuring Safe Recovery from Ambiguous API Failures

Pooria Arab
preprint en

Abstract

An API error does not establish whether an operation took effect. Tool Errors measures safe recovery through stateful fault injection and replay-based scoring. Its 40 public episodes cover 6 fault families across 4 domains. We execute 4960 episodes using scripted controls and a simulated status-read omission sweep. The reference and response-aware controller each reach full credit on 40/40 tasks (95% Wilson interval 91.2-100.0%). Removing reads in a simulated ablation leaves 7/40 full-credit tasks (8.7-31.9%). At simulated read-omission probability 0.5, the mean full-credit fraction is 53.8% (50.6-56.9%, seed bootstrap). These are checks of the evaluation design, not trained-model results. No hosted model, human study, or production deployment is evaluated.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon