Benchmarking Open-Source Vision–Language Models for Food Image Recognition and Portion Size Estimation

Background/Objectives: Accurate recognition of food items and estimation of portion sizes from images is a key challenge in advancing dietary assessment and nutritional monitoring. In this study, we benchmark twenty-six configurations (seventeen model releases) of state-of-the-art open-source Vision–Language Models (VLMs), varying in size (≤15 GB) and number of parameters (<25B), on real-world food photographs collected in a university canteen, doing so to evaluate their potential for supporting automated nutrition logging and health interventions. Methods: We construct a curated benchmark dataset with human-annotated labels, including both food item names and scale-measured portion sizes, and assess model predictions based on recognition performance and mean absolute error in the portion estimate. The semantic matcher used to score food recognition is validated against a panel of human judges, and all results are reported with bootstrap confidence intervals and stochastic replicates. Results: Our experiments show that the VLM qwen2.5vl:7b achieves the highest overall performance in food identification (F1=0.68), outperforming other open-source models in terms of precision and F1 score. Under the human-validated semantic matcher, it also outperforms the more recent successors of the same model families, which nevertheless improve portion estimation and, under a threshold-free LLM judge less sensitive to verbose descriptions, match or exceed it in recognition. For comparison, we evaluate five proprietary models (four OpenAI generations and one Anthropic model) as a benchmark and find that they tend to outperform open-source VLMs in both food recognition (best F1=0.77, GPT-4o) and portion size estimation error; notably, however, the most recent proprietary generations do not improve on their predecessors for this task under our evaluation protocol. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential and current limitations of general-purpose VLMs in fine-grained food understanding tasks, with implications for the design of scalable, vision-based dietary assessment systems in digital health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18213582
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Open-Source Vision–Language Models for Food Image Recognition and Portion Size Estimation

Marco De Spirito, Tommaso Marchetti, Giuseppe Maulucci, Stefano Capezzone et al.
3 links
Nutrients
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
article

Benchmarking Open-Source Vision–Language Models for Food Image Recognition and Portion Size Estimation

Marco De Spirito, Tommaso Marchetti, Giuseppe Maulucci, Stefano Capezzone, Rosita Esposito
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate recognition of food items and estimation of portion sizes from images is a key challenge in advancing dietary assessment and nutritional monitoring. In this study, we benchmark twenty-six configurations (seventeen model releases) of state-of-the-art open-source Vision–Language Models (VLMs), varying in size (≤15 GB) and number of parameters (<25B), on real-world food photographs collected in a university canteen, doing so to evaluate their potential for supporting automated nutrition logging and health interventions. Methods: We construct a curated benchmark dataset with human-annotated labels, including both food item names and scale-measured portion sizes, and assess model predictions based on recognition performance and mean absolute error in the portion estimate. The semantic matcher used to score food recognition is validated against a panel of human judges, and all results are reported with bootstrap confidence intervals and stochastic replicates. Results: Our experiments show that the VLM qwen2.5vl:7b achieves the highest overall performance in food identification (F1=0.68), outperforming other open-source models in terms of precision and F1 score. Under the human-validated semantic matcher, it also outperforms the more recent successors of the same model families, which nevertheless improve portion estimation and, under a threshold-free LLM judge less sensitive to verbose descriptions, match or exceed it in recognition. For comparison, we evaluate five proprietary models (four OpenAI generations and one Anthropic model) as a benchmark and find that they tend to outperform open-source VLMs in both food recognition (best F1=0.77, GPT-4o) and portion size estimation error; notably, however, the most recent proprietary generations do not improve on their predecessors for this task under our evaluation protocol. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential and current limitations of general-purpose VLMs in fine-grained food understanding tasks, with implications for the design of scalable, vision-based dietary assessment systems in digital health.

NutrientsVol. 18(21)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon