Soil Health Indicator Responses to Different Crop Production Systems

Various crop production systems have affected soil health by changing soil physical, chemical and biological properties. In general, differences in crop production management systems include crop rotations, tillage and crop types. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the changes of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil water holding capacity (SWHC), bulk density (BD) and total porosity (TP) following various crop production management practices in Western Kentucky. The study was conducted in Calloway and McLean counties and were performed in a 90m x 90m area. These fields consisted of row crops (CRP, Bean Field, Woods Field, Corn Field, Conventional Tillage Field, Wheat Field) and specialty crops (Squash Field, Berry Field). Each of the sites were used to take three undisturbed and three disturbed soil samples, with total of 24 undisturbed and 24 disturbed samples. In this study, the field with the highest SOC was field “CRP” at 3.35% and the lowest was “Squash Field” at 2.21%. Field “Corn Field” held the highest BD, 1.39g/cm3 and “Wheat Field” had the lowest BD at 1.15g/cm3. The highest SWHC was 40.62% in “CRP field” and the lowest was in “Corn Field” at 34.14%. In TP, the highest level was 56.62 g/cm3 in field “Wheat Field” and the lowest was 47.63g/cm3 in “Corn Field” The data from this evaluation can help farmers and growers understand the dynamics of their soil health. This will allow them to make better crop production system choices. Keywords: Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Water Holding Capacity, Bulk Density, Total Porosity, Soil Health

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Published
2026-10-27
Primary Topic
Soil Management and Crop Yield
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Health Indicator Responses to Different Crop Production Systems

Lynnlee Jones
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Soil Management and Crop Yield
article

Soil Health Indicator Responses to Different Crop Production Systems

Lynnlee Jones
article en

Abstract

Various crop production systems have affected soil health by changing soil physical, chemical and biological properties. In general, differences in crop production management systems include crop rotations, tillage and crop types. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the changes of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil water holding capacity (SWHC), bulk density (BD) and total porosity (TP) following various crop production management practices in Western Kentucky. The study was conducted in Calloway and McLean counties and were performed in a 90m x 90m area. These fields consisted of row crops (CRP, Bean Field, Woods Field, Corn Field, Conventional Tillage Field, Wheat Field) and specialty crops (Squash Field, Berry Field). Each of the sites were used to take three undisturbed and three disturbed soil samples, with total of 24 undisturbed and 24 disturbed samples. In this study, the field with the highest SOC was field “CRP” at 3.35% and the lowest was “Squash Field” at 2.21%. Field “Corn Field” held the highest BD, 1.39g/cm3 and “Wheat Field” had the lowest BD at 1.15g/cm3. The highest SWHC was 40.62% in “CRP field” and the lowest was in “Corn Field” at 34.14%. In TP, the highest level was 56.62 g/cm3 in field “Wheat Field” and the lowest was 47.63g/cm3 in “Corn Field” The data from this evaluation can help farmers and growers understand the dynamics of their soil health. This will allow them to make better crop production system choices. Keywords: Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Water Holding Capacity, Bulk Density, Total Porosity, Soil Health

Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Murray State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Soil Management and Crop Yield
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon