Paracetamol Plus Tramadol Versus Fentanyl as Pre-emptive Analgesia for Enhanced Recovery after Day-Case Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract Background: Effective perioperative pain control is central to enhanced recovery after day-case surgery, yet the optimal pre-emptive analgesic strategy for ambulatory procedures remains debated. This trial compared pre-emptive intravenous paracetamol plus tramadol with pre-emptive intravenous fentanyl for enhanced recovery following day-case surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomised controlled trial, 102 adult patients (ASA physical status I–II, aged 21–65 years, BMI 25–30 kg/m²) scheduled for elective day-case surgery lasting 1–2 hours were randomly allocated 1:1 to intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg) plus tramadol (1 mg/kg) (Group T, n=51) or intravenous fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) (Group F, n=51) before induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the Enhanced Recovery Score (QoR-40), recorded 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative VAS pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, RASS scores, perioperative haemodynamics, hospital stay duration, and adverse events. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The Enhanced Recovery Score was significantly higher in Group T than Group F (188.06±4.29 vs 179.82±5.17; p=0.0001). Group T had lower VAS scores on arrival and at 1 hour (p<0.001), whereas Group F had lower VAS scores from 4 hours onward (p<0.001); despite this, Group T had a markedly longer time to first rescue analgesia (median 6 vs 1 hour; p<0.001). Group T showed deeper sedation on RASS immediately after extubation and on arrival to the PACU (p<0.001), with no difference by 20 minutes. Postoperative heart rate was higher in Group F (76.61±9.74 vs 72.73±7.76 beats/min; p=0.028); other haemodynamic parameters and hospital stay did not differ significantly. No other adverse events occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred at a low, similar rate in both groups. Conclusion: Pre-emptive paracetamol plus tramadol provided better early analgesia, markedly delayed the need for rescue analgesia, and was associated with a higher Enhanced Recovery Score than pre-emptive fentanyl in patients undergoing day-case surgery, despite higher pain scores from 4 hours onward and deeper early postoperative sedation. Both regimens showed a comparable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered on 14 th of August 2023 on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05990686) prior to enrolment of the first participant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10779559/v1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Paracetamol Plus Tramadol Versus Fentanyl as Pre-emptive Analgesia for Enhanced Recovery after Day-Case Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Wo'oud Mohiedden Mohammad Abdelfattah, Ayatullah Hegazy, Khaled Saleh, Salwa Samir Elsayed Ibrahim ElSherbeny et al.
Research Square
Anesthesia and Pain Management
preprint

Paracetamol Plus Tramadol Versus Fentanyl as Pre-emptive Analgesia for Enhanced Recovery after Day-Case Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Wo'oud Mohiedden Mohammad Abdelfattah, Ayatullah Hegazy, Khaled Saleh, Salwa Samir Elsayed Ibrahim ElSherbeny, Michael Adel Shaker
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Effective perioperative pain control is central to enhanced recovery after day-case surgery, yet the optimal pre-emptive analgesic strategy for ambulatory procedures remains debated. This trial compared pre-emptive intravenous paracetamol plus tramadol with pre-emptive intravenous fentanyl for enhanced recovery following day-case surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomised controlled trial, 102 adult patients (ASA physical status I–II, aged 21–65 years, BMI 25–30 kg/m²) scheduled for elective day-case surgery lasting 1–2 hours were randomly allocated 1:1 to intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg) plus tramadol (1 mg/kg) (Group T, n=51) or intravenous fentanyl (1.5 µg/kg) (Group F, n=51) before induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the Enhanced Recovery Score (QoR-40), recorded 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative VAS pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, RASS scores, perioperative haemodynamics, hospital stay duration, and adverse events. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The Enhanced Recovery Score was significantly higher in Group T than Group F (188.06±4.29 vs 179.82±5.17; p=0.0001). Group T had lower VAS scores on arrival and at 1 hour (p<0.001), whereas Group F had lower VAS scores from 4 hours onward (p<0.001); despite this, Group T had a markedly longer time to first rescue analgesia (median 6 vs 1 hour; p<0.001). Group T showed deeper sedation on RASS immediately after extubation and on arrival to the PACU (p<0.001), with no difference by 20 minutes. Postoperative heart rate was higher in Group F (76.61±9.74 vs 72.73±7.76 beats/min; p=0.028); other haemodynamic parameters and hospital stay did not differ significantly. No other adverse events occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred at a low, similar rate in both groups. Conclusion: Pre-emptive paracetamol plus tramadol provided better early analgesia, markedly delayed the need for rescue analgesia, and was associated with a higher Enhanced Recovery Score than pre-emptive fentanyl in patients undergoing day-case surgery, despite higher pain scores from 4 hours onward and deeper early postoperative sedation. Both regimens showed a comparable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered on 14 th of August 2023 on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05990686) prior to enrolment of the first participant.

Research Square
Zagazig University (EG), Dubai Hospital (AE), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE)
Good health and well-being
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon