National federalism, internal geopolitics, and non-state armed groups in Ethiopia

Ethiopia's national federalism (also termed ethnic or ethno-linguistic federalism) was adopted in 1995 to end the armed rebellion produced by imperial and Derg centralism. Yet, armed mobilization escalated after 2018. Based on 27 in-depth key informant interviews and documentation analysis in Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, and Benishangul-Gumuz, this paper identifies why. First, the paper introduce the idea of hollowed autonomy, the loss of autonomous authority through political and security arrangements, even as formal autonomy and symbolic autonomy continue to exist. The paper argues that it is the loss of hollowed autonomy, and not federalism per se or centralized government structures, which drives post-2018 mobilization, since the 2019 political merger has eliminated the political avenue that had compensated for EPRDF centralization. Geopolitical competition accounts for the locus: mobilization occurred in contested zones (Addis Ababa, Metekel, and Wolkayt-Humera) where federal intervention was the trigger.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional & Federal Studies
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2026.2753127
Primary Topic
African history and culture analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National federalism, internal geopolitics, and non-state armed groups in Ethiopia

Taye Demissie Beshi, Yayew Genet Chekol
Regional & Federal Studies
African history and culture analysis
article

National federalism, internal geopolitics, and non-state armed groups in Ethiopia

Taye Demissie Beshi, Yayew Genet Chekol
article en

Abstract

Ethiopia's national federalism (also termed ethnic or ethno-linguistic federalism) was adopted in 1995 to end the armed rebellion produced by imperial and Derg centralism. Yet, armed mobilization escalated after 2018. Based on 27 in-depth key informant interviews and documentation analysis in Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, and Benishangul-Gumuz, this paper identifies why. First, the paper introduce the idea of hollowed autonomy, the loss of autonomous authority through political and security arrangements, even as formal autonomy and symbolic autonomy continue to exist. The paper argues that it is the loss of hollowed autonomy, and not federalism per se or centralized government structures, which drives post-2018 mobilization, since the 2019 political merger has eliminated the political avenue that had compensated for EPRDF centralization. Geopolitical competition accounts for the locus: mobilization occurred in contested zones (Addis Ababa, Metekel, and Wolkayt-Humera) where federal intervention was the trigger.

Regional & Federal Studies
Bahir Dar University (ET)
Bahir Dar University
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
African history and culture analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
National federalism, internal geopolitics, and non-state armed groups in Ethiopia — Taye Demissie Beshi, Yayew Genet Chekol · Regional & Federal Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS