Elevated Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure in complete atrioventricular block and its response to atrioventricular-synchronous pacing

Background Complete atrioventricular block causes both bradycardia and loss of atrioventricular synchrony. Case reports have described marked elevations in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure that fall after pacing, but the prevalence and consistency of this phenotype have not been examined in a cohort. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients in sinus rhythm with complete atrioventricular block and a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50%, identified from 142 permanent pacemaker implantations at one center between 2021 and 2026. Right atrial pressure was estimated using current guideline categories. The prespecified primary endpoint was the paired change in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure between the native state and the first study within 72 h of atrioventricular-synchronous pacing. Tricuspid regurgitant signal quality was graded on envelope completeness and analyzed alongside it. Results Thirty patients formed the native cohort and 14 had paired studies. Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was 44.0 mmHg (interquartile range 32.4–50.3) during native block and was 35 mmHg or greater in 21 patients. In the paired cohort it fell from 46.6 to 25.0 mmHg in all 14 patients (median relative change −51.4%; P < 0.001), and the proportion with values of 35 mmHg or greater fell from 11 to 3 ( P = 0.008). Both the tricuspid regurgitant gradient and the estimated right atrial pressure decreased, and tricuspid regurgitation grade fell in 7 patients and increased in none. Paced QRS duration increased, and the heart-rate change was not correlated with the change in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure. Signal quality tended to decline after pacing; in a post hoc analysis restricted to the 7 patients in whom it was unchanged or improved, the reduction persisted (median relative change −33.8%; P = 0.016). In four catheterized patients, Doppler estimates diverged from invasive pressures in both directions. Conclusion Elevated Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was common during complete atrioventricular block and fell consistently after atrioventricular-synchronous pacing. Because signal quality changed concurrently and invasive pressure did not invariably track the estimate, the magnitude of the observed Doppler reduction, and whether pulmonary artery pressure itself falls, remain uncertain.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1967085
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevated Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure in complete atrioventricular block and its response to atrioventricular-synchronous pacing

Byeng-Ju Son, Byung-Jun Kim, Hong-Ju Kim, Hyongjun Kim et al.
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Elevated Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure in complete atrioventricular block and its response to atrioventricular-synchronous pacing

Byeng-Ju Son, Byung-Jun Kim, Hong-Ju Kim, Hyongjun Kim, Sungyun Jung
article en

Abstract

Background Complete atrioventricular block causes both bradycardia and loss of atrioventricular synchrony. Case reports have described marked elevations in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure that fall after pacing, but the prevalence and consistency of this phenotype have not been examined in a cohort. Methods We retrospectively studied consecutive patients in sinus rhythm with complete atrioventricular block and a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 50%, identified from 142 permanent pacemaker implantations at one center between 2021 and 2026. Right atrial pressure was estimated using current guideline categories. The prespecified primary endpoint was the paired change in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure between the native state and the first study within 72 h of atrioventricular-synchronous pacing. Tricuspid regurgitant signal quality was graded on envelope completeness and analyzed alongside it. Results Thirty patients formed the native cohort and 14 had paired studies. Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was 44.0 mmHg (interquartile range 32.4–50.3) during native block and was 35 mmHg or greater in 21 patients. In the paired cohort it fell from 46.6 to 25.0 mmHg in all 14 patients (median relative change −51.4%; P < 0.001), and the proportion with values of 35 mmHg or greater fell from 11 to 3 ( P = 0.008). Both the tricuspid regurgitant gradient and the estimated right atrial pressure decreased, and tricuspid regurgitation grade fell in 7 patients and increased in none. Paced QRS duration increased, and the heart-rate change was not correlated with the change in Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure. Signal quality tended to decline after pacing; in a post hoc analysis restricted to the 7 patients in whom it was unchanged or improved, the reduction persisted (median relative change −33.8%; P = 0.016). In four catheterized patients, Doppler estimates diverged from invasive pressures in both directions. Conclusion Elevated Doppler-estimated right ventricular systolic pressure was common during complete atrioventricular block and fell consistently after atrioventricular-synchronous pacing. Because signal quality changed concurrently and invasive pressure did not invariably track the estimate, the magnitude of the observed Doppler reduction, and whether pulmonary artery pressure itself falls, remain uncertain.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon