Reaching the People and Places Markets Left Behind: The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in American Public Policy

In the United States, private credit supports both welfare provision and economic growth, so the people and places that credit markets have left behind are excluded from both at once. Political economy has yet to develop an integrated account of this, as analyses of welfare and growth models treat the two spheres separately and assume that credit reaches all communities. This Perspective argues that community development financial institutions (CDFIs) answer that double exclusion with a double remedy, financing projects that serve welfare and development within a single transaction. CDFIs also reverse the familiar sequence of state policy design and private delivery, having developed several of the financial practices that federal policymakers later adopted. Yet the politics of CDFIs, though repeatedly contested, remains under-conceptualized. We close by asking who decides where that double remedy reaches, and whether the communities affected have sufficient influence over those decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Policy Journal
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55845/2qsfgq18
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reaching the People and Places Markets Left Behind: The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in American Public Policy

James D. G. Wood, Nancy O. Andrews
Public Policy Journal
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Reaching the People and Places Markets Left Behind: The Role of Community Development Financial Institutions in American Public Policy

James D. G. Wood, Nancy O. Andrews
article en

Abstract

In the United States, private credit supports both welfare provision and economic growth, so the people and places that credit markets have left behind are excluded from both at once. Political economy has yet to develop an integrated account of this, as analyses of welfare and growth models treat the two spheres separately and assume that credit reaches all communities. This Perspective argues that community development financial institutions (CDFIs) answer that double exclusion with a double remedy, financing projects that serve welfare and development within a single transaction. CDFIs also reverse the familiar sequence of state policy design and private delivery, having developed several of the financial practices that federal policymakers later adopted. Yet the politics of CDFIs, though repeatedly contested, remains under-conceptualized. We close by asking who decides where that double remedy reaches, and whether the communities affected have sufficient influence over those decisions.

Public Policy JournalVol. 1(1)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon