Four Structural Dilemmas of Contemporary Capitalism and Their Coupling Mechanism

The crisis of contemporary capitalism is not a simple accumulation of isolated problems. This paper employs system dynamics as an analytical method to propose four structural dilemmas: accumulation–distribution, capital–democracy time, marketization–social trust, and accumulation–ecological boundaries. By "structural dilemmas," it is meant not that capitalism has no room for correction, but that certain tensions are repeatedly reproduced by the system's routine incentives, with corrections relying on countervailing institutional forces such as redistribution, labor institutions, antitrust, long-term public investment, and ecological regulation. This paper uses the concept of "institutionalized primacy of private interests" to summarize the selection and amplification of self-interested behavior by property rights, competition, and incentive structures, revealing the positive-feedback coupling among the four dilemmas and the conditional nature of negative feedback. The Nordic experience demonstrates that institutional differences can significantly alter the intensity of these dilemmas, but the remedial mechanisms are politically conditional and reversible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23716431
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Four Structural Dilemmas of Contemporary Capitalism and Their Coupling Mechanism

Guoping Hua
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Economy and Marxism
preprint

Four Structural Dilemmas of Contemporary Capitalism and Their Coupling Mechanism

Guoping Hua
preprint en

Abstract

The crisis of contemporary capitalism is not a simple accumulation of isolated problems. This paper employs system dynamics as an analytical method to propose four structural dilemmas: accumulation–distribution, capital–democracy time, marketization–social trust, and accumulation–ecological boundaries. By "structural dilemmas," it is meant not that capitalism has no room for correction, but that certain tensions are repeatedly reproduced by the system's routine incentives, with corrections relying on countervailing institutional forces such as redistribution, labor institutions, antitrust, long-term public investment, and ecological regulation. This paper uses the concept of "institutionalized primacy of private interests" to summarize the selection and amplification of self-interested behavior by property rights, competition, and incentive structures, revealing the positive-feedback coupling among the four dilemmas and the conditional nature of negative feedback. The Nordic experience demonstrates that institutional differences can significantly alter the intensity of these dilemmas, but the remedial mechanisms are politically conditional and reversible.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon