THE EICHMANN TRIAL

This article examines the Eichmann trial as a significant case study in the interaction between Israeli domestic law and international criminal law. It focuses on the legal framework through which Israel prosecuted Adolf Eichmann, with particular attention to universal jurisdiction, the principle of legality, individual criminal responsibility, the rejection of the superior-orders defense, and the legal significance of genocide and crimes against humanity. The article distinguishes between the retroactive Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law 1950, under which Eichmann was prosecuted, and the separate Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Law 1950, which reflected the international legal framework established by the 1948 Genocide Convention. It argues that the Eichmann proceedings operated simultaneously on two levels: domestically, as an exercise of criminal justice for Nazi atrocities, and internationally, as an important contribution to the development of principles subsequently central to international criminal law. The article therefore considers the trial not merely as a historical proceeding, but as an important example of the interaction between a national legal order and emerging international legal norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23741307
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE EICHMANN TRIAL

Abed Zoabi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Law and Human Rights
article

THE EICHMANN TRIAL

Abed Zoabi
article en

Abstract

This article examines the Eichmann trial as a significant case study in the interaction between Israeli domestic law and international criminal law. It focuses on the legal framework through which Israel prosecuted Adolf Eichmann, with particular attention to universal jurisdiction, the principle of legality, individual criminal responsibility, the rejection of the superior-orders defense, and the legal significance of genocide and crimes against humanity. The article distinguishes between the retroactive Nazis and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law 1950, under which Eichmann was prosecuted, and the separate Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Law 1950, which reflected the international legal framework established by the 1948 Genocide Convention. It argues that the Eichmann proceedings operated simultaneously on two levels: domestically, as an exercise of criminal justice for Nazi atrocities, and internationally, as an important contribution to the development of principles subsequently central to international criminal law. The article therefore considers the trial not merely as a historical proceeding, but as an important example of the interaction between a national legal order and emerging international legal norms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon