Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Being Considered for Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) are an alternative to transvenous devices (TV-ICD) in patients not requiring bradycardia pacing, resynchronization (CRT) or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). At our center, S-ICDs are often preferred in patients being considered for heart transplantation (HTx) without pacing/CRT/ATP needs, as their removal post-HTx avoids retained transvenous leads which can preclude MRI surveillance for graft rejection. We assessed outcomes of S-ICDs in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 201 S-ICD implants at our center; July 2016 - March 2025. RESULTS: We identified 33 patients (22 male; age 46 ± 13 years) who, at time of S-ICD implant, had been referred for HTx evaluation or were referred at any time thereafter. Etiologies were nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 18), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 5), ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 4), congenital heart disease (n = 4), and myocarditis (n = 2). Median follow-up was 296 days [IQR = 72-798]. Two patients died, both non-arrhythmic. Four patients received appropriate S-ICD therapies and three had inappropriate shocks due to P- or T-wave oversensing (TWOS) (n = 2), or a rapidly conducted atrial arrhythmia (n = 1). Three patients, all with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, received transvenous device upgrades: one to CRT-P for disease progression, one to TV-ICD for ATP-terminable ventricular tachycardia and one to TV-ICD due to inappropriate shocks from TWOS. Thirteen patients underwent HTx at median 257 days [IQR = 130-453] post S-ICD; three of whom were bridged with HeartMate 3 LVADs. One LVAD patient needed S-ICD deactivation due to electromagnetic interference. There were no retained device components following HTx and S-ICD extraction. CONCLUSION: In selected pre-HTx patients, S-ICDs offer arrhythmic protection while avoiding retained leads post-HTx.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70469
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Being Considered for Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Aaron A. Adonopulos, K. Muthiah, Callum Cherrett, RAJESH N. SUBBIAH et al.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Being Considered for Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Aaron A. Adonopulos, K. Muthiah, Callum Cherrett, RAJESH N. SUBBIAH, Peter Simon Macdonald, Chris Hayward, Rohan Joshua Krishnaswamy, Alasdair John Watson
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) are an alternative to transvenous devices (TV-ICD) in patients not requiring bradycardia pacing, resynchronization (CRT) or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). At our center, S-ICDs are often preferred in patients being considered for heart transplantation (HTx) without pacing/CRT/ATP needs, as their removal post-HTx avoids retained transvenous leads which can preclude MRI surveillance for graft rejection. We assessed outcomes of S-ICDs in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 201 S-ICD implants at our center; July 2016 - March 2025. RESULTS: We identified 33 patients (22 male; age 46 ± 13 years) who, at time of S-ICD implant, had been referred for HTx evaluation or were referred at any time thereafter. Etiologies were nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 18), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 5), ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 4), congenital heart disease (n = 4), and myocarditis (n = 2). Median follow-up was 296 days [IQR = 72-798]. Two patients died, both non-arrhythmic. Four patients received appropriate S-ICD therapies and three had inappropriate shocks due to P- or T-wave oversensing (TWOS) (n = 2), or a rapidly conducted atrial arrhythmia (n = 1). Three patients, all with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, received transvenous device upgrades: one to CRT-P for disease progression, one to TV-ICD for ATP-terminable ventricular tachycardia and one to TV-ICD due to inappropriate shocks from TWOS. Thirteen patients underwent HTx at median 257 days [IQR = 130-453] post S-ICD; three of whom were bridged with HeartMate 3 LVADs. One LVAD patient needed S-ICD deactivation due to electromagnetic interference. There were no retained device components following HTx and S-ICD extraction. CONCLUSION: In selected pre-HTx patients, S-ICDs offer arrhythmic protection while avoiding retained leads post-HTx.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon