Plant-Derived Phytonutritional Ingredients for Food and Pet Food: Processing, Functionality, and Applications

Processing modifies the structure, nutritional characteristics, and technological properties of plant-derived food matrices, but findings from isolated ingredients and experimental models do not necessarily describe their performance in finished foods. This selective narrative review examines five processing-responsive matrix categories relevant to functional-food development: legume-derived protein–carbohydrate matrices, resistant and slowly digestible carbohydrates, plant-derived dietary fibers, prebiotic fibers and oligosaccharides, and fermented plant ingredients. Evidence from human-food research is synthesized to examine the effects of thermal, enzymatic, mechanical, pressure-based, extraction, and fermentation processes on matrix properties, digestibility, fermentability, and food applications. Physicochemical, in vitro, cellular, animal-model, and human-intervention findings are distinguished according to their experimental systems. Feeding studies in dogs and cats are considered separately as application-level evidence from formulated diets, with emphasis on nutrient digestibility, fecal characteristics, fermentation metabolites, microbiota responses, postprandial glycemic responses, and dietary acceptance. Reported outcomes differ with ingredient composition, processing conditions, inclusion level, and dietary formulation, while the heterogeneity and limited duration of many feeding studies restrict conclusions about longer-term physiological effects. Across the selected literature, matrix properties measured before food manufacture require separate evaluation after formulation, and experimental indicators of functionality should not be treated as demonstrated health benefits without appropriate evidence. The review provides a processing–matrix–function framework for interpreting plant-derived ingredients in finished foods while identifying limitations in the assessment of their physiological relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15213859
Primary Topic
Food composition and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant-Derived Phytonutritional Ingredients for Food and Pet Food: Processing, Functionality, and Applications

Anusorn Seubsai, Phanwipa Wongphan, Atcharawan Srisa, Khwanchat Promhuad et al.
2 links
Foods
Food composition and properties
article

Plant-Derived Phytonutritional Ingredients for Food and Pet Food: Processing, Functionality, and Applications

Anusorn Seubsai, Phanwipa Wongphan, Atcharawan Srisa, Khwanchat Promhuad, Nathdanai Harnkarnsujarit, Phatthranit Klinmalai, Pitiya Kamonpatana
article en

Abstract

Processing modifies the structure, nutritional characteristics, and technological properties of plant-derived food matrices, but findings from isolated ingredients and experimental models do not necessarily describe their performance in finished foods. This selective narrative review examines five processing-responsive matrix categories relevant to functional-food development: legume-derived protein–carbohydrate matrices, resistant and slowly digestible carbohydrates, plant-derived dietary fibers, prebiotic fibers and oligosaccharides, and fermented plant ingredients. Evidence from human-food research is synthesized to examine the effects of thermal, enzymatic, mechanical, pressure-based, extraction, and fermentation processes on matrix properties, digestibility, fermentability, and food applications. Physicochemical, in vitro, cellular, animal-model, and human-intervention findings are distinguished according to their experimental systems. Feeding studies in dogs and cats are considered separately as application-level evidence from formulated diets, with emphasis on nutrient digestibility, fecal characteristics, fermentation metabolites, microbiota responses, postprandial glycemic responses, and dietary acceptance. Reported outcomes differ with ingredient composition, processing conditions, inclusion level, and dietary formulation, while the heterogeneity and limited duration of many feeding studies restrict conclusions about longer-term physiological effects. Across the selected literature, matrix properties measured before food manufacture require separate evaluation after formulation, and experimental indicators of functionality should not be treated as demonstrated health benefits without appropriate evidence. The review provides a processing–matrix–function framework for interpreting plant-derived ingredients in finished foods while identifying limitations in the assessment of their physiological relevance.

FoodsVol. 15(21)
Kasetsart University (TH), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Kasetsart University, National Research Council of Thailand
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Food composition and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon