Insight Into the Comparatively Weak Geo‐Effectiveness of the May 2024 ICME

Abstract The unusual ICME (interplanetary coronal mass ejection) of 10–11 May 2024, classified at the highest G5‐level in the American Geological Survey, produced the 2nd most intense geomagnetic storm in space age with revised intensity −606 nT. This study shows that some aspects of geo‐effectiveness of the May 2024 ICME are comparatively weak and explains the weakness for the first time. The May 2024 ICME caused only minor technological problems, whereas the ICMEs on 13 March 1989, 6 November 2001, and 30 October 2003 caused power outages. Prompt penetration electric field, F 3 layer, and ionosphere‐thermosphere storms were also weak on 10–11 May 2024. The differences seem due to the differences in the effective impact strength of the ICMEs, which involve the impulsive change ΔIEFy in the Y‐component of the interplanetary electric field (IEFy) at the ICME front and average IEFy in the ICME body. The May 2024 ICME is less geoeffective probably because it has large and rapid fluctuations at its front, so that, similar to other ICMEs, its ΔIEFy <4 mV/m. The highly geoeffective ICMEs causing even power outages have strong ΔIEFy >15 mV/m. The average IEFy in the body of the respective ICMEs is <20 and more than 20 mV/m.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026ja035527
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insight Into the Comparatively Weak Geo‐Effectiveness of the May 2024 ICME

Tarun Kumar Pant, Inez Staciarini Batista, L. Navarro, V. Manu et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Insight Into the Comparatively Weak Geo‐Effectiveness of the May 2024 ICME

Tarun Kumar Pant, Inez Staciarini Batista, L. Navarro, V. Manu, Nanan Balan, K. Shiokawa, Bela G. Fejer, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Yuichi Otsuka, Jiuhou Lei, Jijin K. Raj, K. Nakamura
article en

Abstract

Abstract The unusual ICME (interplanetary coronal mass ejection) of 10–11 May 2024, classified at the highest G5‐level in the American Geological Survey, produced the 2nd most intense geomagnetic storm in space age with revised intensity −606 nT. This study shows that some aspects of geo‐effectiveness of the May 2024 ICME are comparatively weak and explains the weakness for the first time. The May 2024 ICME caused only minor technological problems, whereas the ICMEs on 13 March 1989, 6 November 2001, and 30 October 2003 caused power outages. Prompt penetration electric field, F 3 layer, and ionosphere‐thermosphere storms were also weak on 10–11 May 2024. The differences seem due to the differences in the effective impact strength of the ICMEs, which involve the impulsive change ΔIEFy in the Y‐component of the interplanetary electric field (IEFy) at the ICME front and average IEFy in the ICME body. The May 2024 ICME is less geoeffective probably because it has large and rapid fluctuations at its front, so that, similar to other ICMEs, its ΔIEFy <4 mV/m. The highly geoeffective ICMEs causing even power outages have strong ΔIEFy >15 mV/m. The average IEFy in the body of the respective ICMEs is <20 and more than 20 mV/m.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(11)
Utah State University (US), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Shandong University (CN), University of Colorado Boulder (US), National Space Science Center (CN), Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University (JP), Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (IN), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon