The SPARC framework: Integrating cognitive processes into mathematical modelling of travel behaviour

This paper proposes the SPARC (Systemic–Psychological–Analytical–Reflective–Cognitive) framework for organising how psychological mechanisms are represented within mathematical models of travel behaviour. Rather than introducing a new estimator, it provides a mapping architecture spanning discrete choice, latent-class, dynamic, agent-based and machine-learning approaches, arguing that psychological claims in such studies often depend on data and measurement design, not model structure. Where existing integrative approaches bond psychological constructs to choice models as variables in a utility function, SPARC bonds the process architecture to model structure: which cognitive system is operative becomes structural, subject to an explicit identification condition. We carry one such bond through completely, from dual-process theory to a gated mixture of two behaviourally distinct kernels and the data required to license the interpretation, and sketch a scheme for others. Estimated on the public Swissmetro panel against three conventional comparators, it proves competitive; no predictive superiority is claimed. Its evidence is of a different kind: a latent class model free to respond to attributes in both classes places one at the attribute insensitivity the theory predicts, a psychological prediction confirmed by an estimator with no reason to confirm it. On simulated data it is correctly rejected where no switching exists, and recovers within-person switching where a trigger varies across occasions. In Swissmetro the identification condition is not met; we specify data that would meet it. The contribution is methodological: a scheme for bonding process theory to estimable structure, and the conditions under which such a bond is earned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102317
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The SPARC framework: Integrating cognitive processes into mathematical modelling of travel behaviour

Ondrej Přibyl, Michal Matowicki
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

The SPARC framework: Integrating cognitive processes into mathematical modelling of travel behaviour

Ondrej Přibyl, Michal Matowicki
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes the SPARC (Systemic–Psychological–Analytical–Reflective–Cognitive) framework for organising how psychological mechanisms are represented within mathematical models of travel behaviour. Rather than introducing a new estimator, it provides a mapping architecture spanning discrete choice, latent-class, dynamic, agent-based and machine-learning approaches, arguing that psychological claims in such studies often depend on data and measurement design, not model structure. Where existing integrative approaches bond psychological constructs to choice models as variables in a utility function, SPARC bonds the process architecture to model structure: which cognitive system is operative becomes structural, subject to an explicit identification condition. We carry one such bond through completely, from dual-process theory to a gated mixture of two behaviourally distinct kernels and the data required to license the interpretation, and sketch a scheme for others. Estimated on the public Swissmetro panel against three conventional comparators, it proves competitive; no predictive superiority is claimed. Its evidence is of a different kind: a latent class model free to respond to attributes in both classes places one at the attribute insensitivity the theory predicts, a psychological prediction confirmed by an estimator with no reason to confirm it. On simulated data it is correctly rejected where no switching exists, and recovers within-person switching where a trigger varies across occasions. In Swissmetro the identification condition is not met; we specify data that would meet it. The contribution is methodological: a scheme for bonding process theory to estimable structure, and the conditions under which such a bond is earned.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 40
Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon