Economic and climate implications of diesel backup power in outage-affected countries

Chronic electricity outages can shift the burden of unreliable grid supply to local backup generation, yet cross-country evidence on the scale and consequences of this shift remains limited. This study develops a harmonized framework for 56 outage-affected countries that links reported outage exposure, power-system scale, and empirical seasonal demand factors to retained-demand scenarios, and evaluates the consequences of supplying the resulting backup-electricity requirement with a standardized diesel benchmark. Using source observations with their documented reference years retained (WBES outages: 2006–2024; power-system and grid-lifecycle data: 2022–2024; monthly demand: 2024; diesel-price and exchange-rate evidence: 2025), the R20 reference modeling scenario (20% retained demand) yields an expected annual backup-electricity requirement of approximately 4.275 TWh across the 56-country sample. At a reference generator efficiency of 35%, diesel fuel-cycle emissions are estimated at 3.971 MtCO 2 e/year, compared with 2.123 MtCO 2 e/year for the corresponding grid lifecycle counterfactual, yielding a net additional climate burden of 1.849 MtCO 2 e/year. For the 26 countries with complete matched diesel-price, grid-tariff, and exchange-rate evidence, the net avoidable operating-energy cost is USD 306.9–484.4 million/year, where the range reflects admissible tariff branches rather than probabilistic uncertainty. Country-level empirical P05–P95 ranges describe seasonal variation, while retained demand, generator efficiency, tariff evidence, and upstream diesel pathways are evaluated separately as scenario, sensitivity, and structural-robustness dimensions. The results reveal strong cross-country heterogeneity and show that aggregate burden and per-unit impact structure do not necessarily move together. The framework provides a transparent benchmark for comparing outage-driven diesel burdens and for future assessment of resilience and lower-emission backup transitions without relying on composite vulnerability scores or policy-priority thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2026.105497
Primary Topic
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic and climate implications of diesel backup power in outage-affected countries

Muhammad Shafique, Fangjie Liu, Xiaowei Luo, Yixuan Liu
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
article

Economic and climate implications of diesel backup power in outage-affected countries

Muhammad Shafique, Fangjie Liu, Xiaowei Luo, Yixuan Liu
article en

Abstract

Chronic electricity outages can shift the burden of unreliable grid supply to local backup generation, yet cross-country evidence on the scale and consequences of this shift remains limited. This study develops a harmonized framework for 56 outage-affected countries that links reported outage exposure, power-system scale, and empirical seasonal demand factors to retained-demand scenarios, and evaluates the consequences of supplying the resulting backup-electricity requirement with a standardized diesel benchmark. Using source observations with their documented reference years retained (WBES outages: 2006–2024; power-system and grid-lifecycle data: 2022–2024; monthly demand: 2024; diesel-price and exchange-rate evidence: 2025), the R20 reference modeling scenario (20% retained demand) yields an expected annual backup-electricity requirement of approximately 4.275 TWh across the 56-country sample. At a reference generator efficiency of 35%, diesel fuel-cycle emissions are estimated at 3.971 MtCO 2 e/year, compared with 2.123 MtCO 2 e/year for the corresponding grid lifecycle counterfactual, yielding a net additional climate burden of 1.849 MtCO 2 e/year. For the 26 countries with complete matched diesel-price, grid-tariff, and exchange-rate evidence, the net avoidable operating-energy cost is USD 306.9–484.4 million/year, where the range reflects admissible tariff branches rather than probabilistic uncertainty. Country-level empirical P05–P95 ranges describe seasonal variation, while retained demand, generator efficiency, tariff evidence, and upstream diesel pathways are evaluated separately as scenario, sensitivity, and structural-robustness dimensions. The results reveal strong cross-country heterogeneity and show that aggregate burden and per-unit impact structure do not necessarily move together. The framework provides a transparent benchmark for comparing outage-driven diesel burdens and for future assessment of resilience and lower-emission backup transitions without relying on composite vulnerability scores or policy-priority thresholds.

Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsVol. 95
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Brunel University of London (GB)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon