Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call

BackgroundOut-of-hours (OOH) CT and MRI examinations at our institution are provisionally reported by on-call radiology residents and used to guide overnight patient management.We aimed to quantify the overnight discrepancy rate between provisional resident reports and subsequent consultant reports, and explore associations between discrepancies and resident grade, study type, and reporting time. MethodsThis registered service evaluation retrospectively reviewed all consecutive CT and MRI examinations provisionally reported overnight by radiology residents between 13 June 2022 and 3 July 2022.Provisional reports were compared with the final consultant reports.Discrepancies were categorised as minor, significant, or major using predefined criteria by an ST4 radiology resident. ResultsIn total, 993 imaging examinations were included.The overall discrepancy rate was 144 (14.5%).Major and significant discrepancies comprised 56 of 993 (5.6%) examinations and were considered potentially management-altering.Discrepancy rates varied significantly by imaging speciality (chi-square (χ²) test, p < 0.001): body imaging (21.6%), musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging (17.2%), neuro-radiological imaging (11.7%), and vascular imaging (5.4%).No statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident training grade (χ² test, p = 0.48) or one-hour reporting time block (χ² test, p = 0.37). ConclusionThis service evaluation showed that provisional radiology reporting is associated with a meaningful discrepancy burden, paying careful attention to variation across imaging specialities.Notably, no statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident seniority or time of reporting.Timely consultant review, structured feedback and targeted quality improvement with re-audit will support safe and accurate OOH reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118704
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call

Hammad Qadi, Anmol Gangi Burton, Ali Rana, Mariam Dean et al.
Cureus
Radiology practices and education
article

Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call

Hammad Qadi, Anmol Gangi Burton, Ali Rana, Mariam Dean, Kar Yan-Yip
article en

Abstract

BackgroundOut-of-hours (OOH) CT and MRI examinations at our institution are provisionally reported by on-call radiology residents and used to guide overnight patient management.We aimed to quantify the overnight discrepancy rate between provisional resident reports and subsequent consultant reports, and explore associations between discrepancies and resident grade, study type, and reporting time. MethodsThis registered service evaluation retrospectively reviewed all consecutive CT and MRI examinations provisionally reported overnight by radiology residents between 13 June 2022 and 3 July 2022.Provisional reports were compared with the final consultant reports.Discrepancies were categorised as minor, significant, or major using predefined criteria by an ST4 radiology resident. ResultsIn total, 993 imaging examinations were included.The overall discrepancy rate was 144 (14.5%).Major and significant discrepancies comprised 56 of 993 (5.6%) examinations and were considered potentially management-altering.Discrepancy rates varied significantly by imaging speciality (chi-square (χ²) test, p < 0.001): body imaging (21.6%), musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging (17.2%), neuro-radiological imaging (11.7%), and vascular imaging (5.4%).No statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident training grade (χ² test, p = 0.48) or one-hour reporting time block (χ² test, p = 0.37). ConclusionThis service evaluation showed that provisional radiology reporting is associated with a meaningful discrepancy burden, paying careful attention to variation across imaging specialities.Notably, no statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident seniority or time of reporting.Timely consultant review, structured feedback and targeted quality improvement with re-audit will support safe and accurate OOH reporting.

Cureus
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Royal Stoke University Hospital (GB), Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon