Effect of ciprofol versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, parallel controlled study

Ciprofol (HSK3486) is a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptor agonist that provides anesthetic efficacy comparable to propofol. This study compared the postoperative recovery quality of ciprofol versus propofol in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. In this prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel controlled study (ChiCTR2400085402), patients who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ciprofol or propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance. The primary endpoint was the restlessness score (RS) after awakening. Between August 9, 2024, and September 29, 2025, 94 patients were randomly assigned to receive ciprofol ( n = 47) or propofol ( n = 47). Patients in the ciprofol group exhibited significantly lower mean RS after awakening (0.17 ± 0.38 vs. 0.48 ± 0.62, P = 0.005), with a higher proportion of patients achieving an RS after awakening of 0 (83.0% vs. 58.7%; P = 0.012). The mean quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) total score on the first day after surgery was 125.38 ± 11.42 in the ciprofol group and 120.60 ± 10.47 in the propofol group ( P = 0.037), with a mean difference of 4.780 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.298–9.277). BIS and vital signs were generally comparable between the two groups at different time points. Times from discontinuation of anesthetic agents to leaving the operating room (15.55 ± 8.88 min vs. 15.20 ± 9.90 min, P = 0.857), extubation (14.19 ± 9.65 min vs. 12.53 ± 8.71 min, P = 0.390), and recovery of spontaneous breathing (5.98 ± 2.66 min vs. 5.50 ± 2.13 min, P = 0.341) were comparable between the ciprofol and propofol groups. No patients in either group experienced intraoperative awareness. Ciprofol also resulted in significantly lower incidences of injection-site pain (2.13% vs. 23.40%; P = 0.002) than propofol. The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting were 12.77% and 21.28%, respectively. Compared with propofol, ciprofol was associated with reduced emergence agitation and injection-site pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400085402. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowprojectEN.html?id=253892&v=1.0 . Date of Registration: 2024-06-06.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04374-x
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of ciprofol versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, parallel controlled study

郭春玉, 安海燕, Shuo Guan, Weisi Ding et al.
3 links
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Effect of ciprofol versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality after laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, parallel controlled study

郭春玉, 安海燕, Shuo Guan, Weisi Ding, Yi Feng, Yue Du, Lingling He, Jiaxing Song, Wanlu Zhao
article en

Abstract

Ciprofol (HSK3486) is a novel gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptor agonist that provides anesthetic efficacy comparable to propofol. This study compared the postoperative recovery quality of ciprofol versus propofol in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. In this prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel controlled study (ChiCTR2400085402), patients who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ciprofol or propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance. The primary endpoint was the restlessness score (RS) after awakening. Between August 9, 2024, and September 29, 2025, 94 patients were randomly assigned to receive ciprofol ( n = 47) or propofol ( n = 47). Patients in the ciprofol group exhibited significantly lower mean RS after awakening (0.17 ± 0.38 vs. 0.48 ± 0.62, P = 0.005), with a higher proportion of patients achieving an RS after awakening of 0 (83.0% vs. 58.7%; P = 0.012). The mean quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) total score on the first day after surgery was 125.38 ± 11.42 in the ciprofol group and 120.60 ± 10.47 in the propofol group ( P = 0.037), with a mean difference of 4.780 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.298–9.277). BIS and vital signs were generally comparable between the two groups at different time points. Times from discontinuation of anesthetic agents to leaving the operating room (15.55 ± 8.88 min vs. 15.20 ± 9.90 min, P = 0.857), extubation (14.19 ± 9.65 min vs. 12.53 ± 8.71 min, P = 0.390), and recovery of spontaneous breathing (5.98 ± 2.66 min vs. 5.50 ± 2.13 min, P = 0.341) were comparable between the ciprofol and propofol groups. No patients in either group experienced intraoperative awareness. Ciprofol also resulted in significantly lower incidences of injection-site pain (2.13% vs. 23.40%; P = 0.002) than propofol. The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting were 12.77% and 21.28%, respectively. Compared with propofol, ciprofol was associated with reduced emergence agitation and injection-site pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400085402. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowprojectEN.html?id=253892&v=1.0 . Date of Registration: 2024-06-06.

BMC Anesthesiology
Peking University (CN), Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
Haisco Pharmaceutical Group
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon