Accuracy and Safety of Three Large Language Models Answering Turkish Questions on Adult Immunization

Vaccine misinformation contributes to falling immunization coverage, and people increasingly bring vaccine questions to chatbots. We evaluated three large language models on 72 Turkish questions on adult immunization, in two arms: 40 patient-focused questions and 32 mapped to CDC/ACIP, WHO or Turkish Ministry of Health recommendations. The 216 responses were blind-coded and scored independently by two blinded specialists against a guideline-anchored answer key. Binary accuracy was 95.1% for Claude Opus 4.8, 93.8% for Gemini-3.1-Pro, and 86.1% for GPT-5.5. Patient-facing questions, including the classic vaccine myths, were answered well (93.8–96.2%), but accuracy on technical guideline content fell to 76.6% for GPT-5.5, which was also the most readable model and referred the reader to a clinician in only 53.1% of guideline-arm responses. Responses were more often incomplete than wrong.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2026.10.12
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy and Safety of Three Large Language Models Answering Turkish Questions on Adult Immunization

Enes ZAFER, Mehmet Yildiz
5 links
Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Accuracy and Safety of Three Large Language Models Answering Turkish Questions on Adult Immunization

Enes ZAFER, Mehmet Yildiz
article en

Abstract

Vaccine misinformation contributes to falling immunization coverage, and people increasingly bring vaccine questions to chatbots. We evaluated three large language models on 72 Turkish questions on adult immunization, in two arms: 40 patient-focused questions and 32 mapped to CDC/ACIP, WHO or Turkish Ministry of Health recommendations. The 216 responses were blind-coded and scored independently by two blinded specialists against a guideline-anchored answer key. Binary accuracy was 95.1% for Claude Opus 4.8, 93.8% for Gemini-3.1-Pro, and 86.1% for GPT-5.5. Patient-facing questions, including the classic vaccine myths, were answered well (93.8–96.2%), but accuracy on technical guideline content fell to 76.6% for GPT-5.5, which was also the most readable model and referred the reader to a clinician in only 53.1% of guideline-arm responses. Responses were more often incomplete than wrong.

Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of SciencesVol. 79(10)
Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Giresun İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Accuracy and Safety of Three Large Language Models Answering Turkish Questions on Adult Immunization — Enes ZAFER, Mehmet Yildiz · Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS