Optimizing an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid decalcification protocol for diagnostic bone biopsies: experience at an Academic Medical Center

Decalcification protocols are necessary for histologic assessment of bone biopsies. Strong acid–based decalcification is rapid but detrimental to nucleic acids, while ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is less harmful but time-consuming. We aimed to standardize a decalcification protocol to optimize turn-around time and tissue preservation. Diagnostic bone core needle biopsies were radiographed for baseline mineralization, fixed in formalin, and transferred to EDTA. Interval radiography was performed until specimens were deemed sufficiently decalcified. Histotechnologists and pathologists evaluated overall histopathologic quality (great, good, poor). Final specimen radiographs were qualitatively assessed for mineralization density (black, gray, white) and distribution (absent, unifocal, multifocal). Logistic regression models were fit to compare the proportion of cores with adequate section quality by mineralization density and distribution, and to infer dose–response relationships, accounting for age, sex, and repeated measurements. Effect size and statistical significance were reported using odds ratios (OR) for non-poor histology and p-values. Fifty-two core needle bone biopsies were collected from 34 patients. Cases with absent mineralization (100%, 6/6) or unifocal gray mineralization (92%, 12/13) typically showed non-poor histology. Cases with multifocal white mineralization often (60%, 3/5) showed poor histology (absent versus multifocal: β = 18.42, p = 0.048; black versus white mineralization: β = 21.091, p = 0.043). Cases with multifocal gray mineralization showed variable results, with 68% (19/28) showing acceptable histology. Minimizing decalcification in select cases may decrease turn-around time without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Complete absence of calcium by specimen radiography is unnecessary to achieve high-quality histologic processing and microscopic analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Histotechnology
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2026.2751403
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid decalcification protocol for diagnostic bone biopsies: experience at an Academic Medical Center

Darcy A. Kerr, Shannon N. Schutz, Evan R. J. Goyette, Joshua Levy et al.
2 links
Journal of Histotechnology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Optimizing an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid decalcification protocol for diagnostic bone biopsies: experience at an Academic Medical Center

Darcy A. Kerr, Shannon N. Schutz, Evan R. J. Goyette, Joshua Levy, Konstantinos D. Linos, Laura Vidis, Jason Ha, Michael L. Baker
article en

Abstract

Decalcification protocols are necessary for histologic assessment of bone biopsies. Strong acid–based decalcification is rapid but detrimental to nucleic acids, while ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is less harmful but time-consuming. We aimed to standardize a decalcification protocol to optimize turn-around time and tissue preservation. Diagnostic bone core needle biopsies were radiographed for baseline mineralization, fixed in formalin, and transferred to EDTA. Interval radiography was performed until specimens were deemed sufficiently decalcified. Histotechnologists and pathologists evaluated overall histopathologic quality (great, good, poor). Final specimen radiographs were qualitatively assessed for mineralization density (black, gray, white) and distribution (absent, unifocal, multifocal). Logistic regression models were fit to compare the proportion of cores with adequate section quality by mineralization density and distribution, and to infer dose–response relationships, accounting for age, sex, and repeated measurements. Effect size and statistical significance were reported using odds ratios (OR) for non-poor histology and p-values. Fifty-two core needle bone biopsies were collected from 34 patients. Cases with absent mineralization (100%, 6/6) or unifocal gray mineralization (92%, 12/13) typically showed non-poor histology. Cases with multifocal white mineralization often (60%, 3/5) showed poor histology (absent versus multifocal: β = 18.42, p = 0.048; black versus white mineralization: β = 21.091, p = 0.043). Cases with multifocal gray mineralization showed variable results, with 68% (19/28) showing acceptable histology. Minimizing decalcification in select cases may decrease turn-around time without compromising diagnostic accuracy. Complete absence of calcium by specimen radiography is unnecessary to achieve high-quality histologic processing and microscopic analysis.

Journal of Histotechnology
Dartmouth College (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon