Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Medical Imaging

Deep learning shows promise for breast cancer diagnosis, but limited interpretability hinders clinical adoption. We benchmark ten ImageNet-pretrained models (ResNet50, VGG19, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, Xception, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, ConvNeXt, ViT, and Swin Transformer) for benign-versus-malignant classification on the BreakHis histopathology dataset using a patient-level split, and explain their predictions with Grad-CAM, LIME, Integrated Gradients, and LRP. DenseNet121 performed best, with 99.4% test accuracy and an AUC-ROC of 0.999, and significantly outperformed all other models (p < 0.001). Transformer-based models trailed the CNNs. The explanations consistently highlighted nuclei-rich and glandular regions of diagnostic relevance. Combining transfer learning with explainable AI can thus yield accurate, interpretable tools for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.37026
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Medical Imaging

Muhammad Atif Saeed, Azka Atiq, Akhtar Jamıl, Abdul Hadi et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
AI in cancer detection
preprint

Interpretable Deep Learning Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Medical Imaging

Muhammad Atif Saeed, Azka Atiq, Akhtar Jamıl, Abdul Hadi, Ahmad Din, Sami Alnawali
preprint en

Abstract

Deep learning shows promise for breast cancer diagnosis, but limited interpretability hinders clinical adoption. We benchmark ten ImageNet-pretrained models (ResNet50, VGG19, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, Xception, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, ConvNeXt, ViT, and Swin Transformer) for benign-versus-malignant classification on the BreakHis histopathology dataset using a patient-level split, and explain their predictions with Grad-CAM, LIME, Integrated Gradients, and LRP. DenseNet121 performed best, with 99.4% test accuracy and an AUC-ROC of 0.999, and significantly outperformed all other models (p < 0.001). Transformer-based models trailed the CNNs. The explanations consistently highlighted nuclei-rich and glandular regions of diagnostic relevance. Combining transfer learning with explainable AI can thus yield accurate, interpretable tools for breast cancer diagnosis.

arXiv (Cornell University)
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon