Defence-Sector Intensity and Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union Under Global Uncertainty: A Multi-Method Assessment

This study examines the association between defence-sector intensity and foreign direct investment (FDI) in 23 European Union countries from 2005 to 2023. Six defence indicators and three global uncertainty measures were analysed using fixed-effects panel regressions, regularised regression, gradient boosting, country-profile comparisons, and panel temporal-predictability tests. In the principal country-and-year fixed-effects models, military expenditure as a percentage of GDP and as a percentage of government expenditure had positive contemporaneous coefficients. Both coefficients remained statistically supported by Driscoll–Kraay and wild-cluster-bootstrap inference after adjustment for the two primary hypotheses, although their Holm-adjusted country-clustered p-values were 0.053. The findings were sensitive to country coverage: excluding Hungary, Ireland, and the Netherlands reduced the standardised estimates, and neither coefficient remained statistically significant under wild-cluster-bootstrap inference. Neither primary indicator was supported in the available-case EU27 extension; matched-period comparisons indicated that this divergence reflected country composition together with the shorter common observation window. Defence indicators did not provide stable incremental predictive information for countries excluded from model fitting, and no temporal-predictability result remained significant after dependence-aware block-bootstrap inference and false-discovery-rate adjustment. Neither global geopolitical risk nor the country profiles provided evidence of coefficient differences. Overall, the evidence is indicator-, sample-, and method-dependent and does not establish a causal or generally applicable effect of defence expenditure on FDI. From a sustainable-development perspective, security expenditure should therefore be assessed alongside fiscal capacity, investment conditions, and country-specific economic structures rather than being assumed either to attract or to displace foreign investment uniformly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su182110962
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defence-Sector Intensity and Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union Under Global Uncertainty: A Multi-Method Assessment

Tomas Ruzgas, Smiltė Ruzgaitė
2 links
Sustainability
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Defence-Sector Intensity and Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union Under Global Uncertainty: A Multi-Method Assessment

Tomas Ruzgas, Smiltė Ruzgaitė
article en

Abstract

This study examines the association between defence-sector intensity and foreign direct investment (FDI) in 23 European Union countries from 2005 to 2023. Six defence indicators and three global uncertainty measures were analysed using fixed-effects panel regressions, regularised regression, gradient boosting, country-profile comparisons, and panel temporal-predictability tests. In the principal country-and-year fixed-effects models, military expenditure as a percentage of GDP and as a percentage of government expenditure had positive contemporaneous coefficients. Both coefficients remained statistically supported by Driscoll–Kraay and wild-cluster-bootstrap inference after adjustment for the two primary hypotheses, although their Holm-adjusted country-clustered p-values were 0.053. The findings were sensitive to country coverage: excluding Hungary, Ireland, and the Netherlands reduced the standardised estimates, and neither coefficient remained statistically significant under wild-cluster-bootstrap inference. Neither primary indicator was supported in the available-case EU27 extension; matched-period comparisons indicated that this divergence reflected country composition together with the shorter common observation window. Defence indicators did not provide stable incremental predictive information for countries excluded from model fitting, and no temporal-predictability result remained significant after dependence-aware block-bootstrap inference and false-discovery-rate adjustment. Neither global geopolitical risk nor the country profiles provided evidence of coefficient differences. Overall, the evidence is indicator-, sample-, and method-dependent and does not establish a causal or generally applicable effect of defence expenditure on FDI. From a sustainable-development perspective, security expenditure should therefore be assessed alongside fiscal capacity, investment conditions, and country-specific economic structures rather than being assumed either to attract or to displace foreign investment uniformly.

SustainabilityVol. 18(21)
Kaunas University of Technology (LT), Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon