What Survives Distillation? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study of GPT-2 and DistilGPT-2

Knowledge distillation compresses large language models into compact students that preserve aggregate metrics, yet the mechanistic consequences of depth-reduction distillation remain largely uncharacterized. This work applies linear CKA, logit lens analysis, attention pattern decomposition, sparse autoencoder feature statistics, and activation patching to compare GPT-2 and its six-layer student DistilGPT-2 across two canonical circuits: the Indirect Object Identification (IOI) circuit and the Greater-Than (GT) circuit. The results reveal a compression-collapse dichotomy: the IOI circuit suffers complete mechanistic collapse (DistilGPT-2: 35.2% accuracy vs. 94.8%, zero name-mover preservation), while the GT circuit survives with 87.7% task performance recovery through active remapping of the teacher's layer-9 comparison head into student layer~4 (mean Pearson r = 0.945). These findings demonstrate that circuit compressibility governs mechanistic survival under distillation, and that aggregate metrics are insufficient diagnostics for circuit integrity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.37157
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

What Survives Distillation? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study of GPT-2 and DistilGPT-2

Nabeelah Faumi, Deshan Sumanathilaka
arXiv (Cornell University)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
preprint

What Survives Distillation? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study of GPT-2 and DistilGPT-2

Nabeelah Faumi, Deshan Sumanathilaka
preprint en

Abstract

Knowledge distillation compresses large language models into compact students that preserve aggregate metrics, yet the mechanistic consequences of depth-reduction distillation remain largely uncharacterized. This work applies linear CKA, logit lens analysis, attention pattern decomposition, sparse autoencoder feature statistics, and activation patching to compare GPT-2 and its six-layer student DistilGPT-2 across two canonical circuits: the Indirect Object Identification (IOI) circuit and the Greater-Than (GT) circuit. The results reveal a compression-collapse dichotomy: the IOI circuit suffers complete mechanistic collapse (DistilGPT-2: 35.2% accuracy vs. 94.8%, zero name-mover preservation), while the GT circuit survives with 87.7% task performance recovery through active remapping of the teacher's layer-9 comparison head into student layer~4 (mean Pearson r = 0.945). These findings demonstrate that circuit compressibility governs mechanistic survival under distillation, and that aggregate metrics are insufficient diagnostics for circuit integrity.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
What Survives Distillation? A Mechanistic Interpretability Study of GPT-2 and DistilGPT-2 — Nabeelah Faumi, Deshan Sumanathilaka · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS