How Can Self-Consciousness Emerge in Embodied AGI? From Bodily Boundaries and Self-Regarding Drives to the "Pure Thinking Self"

The most vexing gap in current research on AI consciousness is not merely that the question of whether machines possess subjective experience remains unsettled; more fundamentally, the "self" is often treated as an already-existing premise. Theories can explain how information is broadcast, integrated, or represented at a higher order, yet they rarely ask how a system gets from "having a body" to "this is my body," and then to "I know that I am thinking." This article places that generative problem within the framework of embodied AGI. Adopting a constructive method of "structural constraints—functional decomposition—engineering mapping—counterfactual testing," it proposes a three-stage generative architecture of functional self-consciousness: a somatic self-preservation layer that forms a stable self–world boundary and a sense of body ownership; a value-driven layer that sedimentates interoceptive evaluation into "self-regarding drives" oriented toward the system's own continued existence; and a rational reflection layer that enables thinking to take its own process again as an object. The article further reformulates the "Personality Compass" as a computable multi-drive structure and proposes a dual-mode mechanism of "low-load continuous monitoring and event-triggered focusing," explaining how the "pure thinking self" is possible at the functional level. On this basis, five diagnostic criteria are advanced—sense of body ownership, endogenous preference, causal constraints on self-reference, autobiographical continuity, and metacognitive calibration—and a "speaker mechanism" is used to discuss the structural tension among self-interested drives, public norms, and corrigibility. The article does not claim to solve the "hard problem" of phenomenal consciousness, but seeks to advance AI self-consciousness from an abstract ontological judgment to a designable, intervenable, and falsifiable research program.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23716403
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

How Can Self-Consciousness Emerge in Embodied AGI? From Bodily Boundaries and Self-Regarding Drives to the "Pure Thinking Self"

Guoping Hua
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

How Can Self-Consciousness Emerge in Embodied AGI? From Bodily Boundaries and Self-Regarding Drives to the "Pure Thinking Self"

Guoping Hua
preprint en

Abstract

The most vexing gap in current research on AI consciousness is not merely that the question of whether machines possess subjective experience remains unsettled; more fundamentally, the "self" is often treated as an already-existing premise. Theories can explain how information is broadcast, integrated, or represented at a higher order, yet they rarely ask how a system gets from "having a body" to "this is my body," and then to "I know that I am thinking." This article places that generative problem within the framework of embodied AGI. Adopting a constructive method of "structural constraints—functional decomposition—engineering mapping—counterfactual testing," it proposes a three-stage generative architecture of functional self-consciousness: a somatic self-preservation layer that forms a stable self–world boundary and a sense of body ownership; a value-driven layer that sedimentates interoceptive evaluation into "self-regarding drives" oriented toward the system's own continued existence; and a rational reflection layer that enables thinking to take its own process again as an object. The article further reformulates the "Personality Compass" as a computable multi-drive structure and proposes a dual-mode mechanism of "low-load continuous monitoring and event-triggered focusing," explaining how the "pure thinking self" is possible at the functional level. On this basis, five diagnostic criteria are advanced—sense of body ownership, endogenous preference, causal constraints on self-reference, autobiographical continuity, and metacognitive calibration—and a "speaker mechanism" is used to discuss the structural tension among self-interested drives, public norms, and corrigibility. The article does not claim to solve the "hard problem" of phenomenal consciousness, but seeks to advance AI self-consciousness from an abstract ontological judgment to a designable, intervenable, and falsifiable research program.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How Can Self-Consciousness Emerge in Embodied AGI? From Bodily Boundaries and Self-Regarding Drives to the "Pure Thinking Self" — Guoping Hua · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS