CONCUR: Concordant Auxiliary Rewards for Multi-Task, Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning

When a Large Language Model (LLM) is trained with Reinforcement Learning (RL) on multiple tasks, a task's primary reward can gate auxiliary rewards such as a length reward: on a failing response, an auxiliary cannot exceed the primary. However, group-relative advantage estimators treat a gated auxiliary like any other component, so it can reverse the primary's order, and at the primary's ceiling only auxiliaries order responses. Keeping gated auxiliaries hurts some tasks, while dropping them hurts others. We propose CONCUR, an advantage estimator that replaces the standardized scores of each gated auxiliary with the closest scores that satisfy two conditions: responses with higher primary rewards cannot receive lower scores, and responses at the primary's ceiling receive equal scores. CONCUR-T applies both conditions throughout training, and CONCUR-A lifts the second for an auxiliary that agrees with the primary's order more often than it reverses it among passing responses. On three models from two families and across math, code, instruction following, and writing, both variants score higher on average than all baselines and than when all the gated auxiliaries are dropped.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.36437
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

CONCUR: Concordant Auxiliary Rewards for Multi-Task, Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning

Cho‐Jui Hsieh, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Si Si, Jixuan Leng et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
preprint

CONCUR: Concordant Auxiliary Rewards for Multi-Task, Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning

Cho‐Jui Hsieh, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Si Si, Jixuan Leng, Fei Wang, Jiong Zhang, Hsiang-Fu Yu
preprint en

Abstract

When a Large Language Model (LLM) is trained with Reinforcement Learning (RL) on multiple tasks, a task's primary reward can gate auxiliary rewards such as a length reward: on a failing response, an auxiliary cannot exceed the primary. However, group-relative advantage estimators treat a gated auxiliary like any other component, so it can reverse the primary's order, and at the primary's ceiling only auxiliaries order responses. Keeping gated auxiliaries hurts some tasks, while dropping them hurts others. We propose CONCUR, an advantage estimator that replaces the standardized scores of each gated auxiliary with the closest scores that satisfy two conditions: responses with higher primary rewards cannot receive lower scores, and responses at the primary's ceiling receive equal scores. CONCUR-T applies both conditions throughout training, and CONCUR-A lifts the second for an auxiliary that agrees with the primary's order more often than it reverses it among passing responses. On three models from two families and across math, code, instruction following, and writing, both variants score higher on average than all baselines and than when all the gated auxiliaries are dropped.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon