Primary and Community-Based Home Care Services for Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Eligibility Criteria and Homebound Status

Background/Objectives: Home-based primary care and community health services can facilitate ageing in place. However, the eligibility criteria for these services vary widely, and how consistently homebound status is identified remains unclear. This scoping review explored the existing literature on primary care or community care home-delivered services for adults aged 60 and older. This paper, the first of two reporting findings from the same review protocol, examines the eligibility criteria used to identify candidates for such care and the extent to which study populations meet homebound criteria. Methods: A scoping review of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest (grey literature) and hand-searching of the citation list was conducted up to February 2026. The study protocol was prospectively registered. Reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: We screened 2834 records (initial and updated searches) and 64 studies published between 1990 and 2026 were included. Eligibility criteria varied substantially, most commonly based on cognitive status, functional dependency, or frailty, though inconsistently defined. Homebound status was rarely reported (11 studies). Applying a classification framework developed for this review, an additional six studies were classified as possibly homebound and 27 studies as at-risk of homebound, without being labelled as such, a pattern extending beyond frailty-related groups to psychosocially vulnerable and general older populations. Conclusions: Eligibility criteria for home-based care are inconsistently defined and reported. Homebound status is rarely reported, even in populations that appear to meet homebound or at-risk criteria. Future research should examine whether a validated primary care screening tool can identify homebound risk earlier.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213670
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary and Community-Based Home Care Services for Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Eligibility Criteria and Homebound Status

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Stella Ploukou, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis, Nikolaos Vlachopoulos et al.
3 links
Healthcare
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Primary and Community-Based Home Care Services for Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Eligibility Criteria and Homebound Status

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Stella Ploukou, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis, Nikolaos Vlachopoulos, Anna‐Bettina Haidich
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Home-based primary care and community health services can facilitate ageing in place. However, the eligibility criteria for these services vary widely, and how consistently homebound status is identified remains unclear. This scoping review explored the existing literature on primary care or community care home-delivered services for adults aged 60 and older. This paper, the first of two reporting findings from the same review protocol, examines the eligibility criteria used to identify candidates for such care and the extent to which study populations meet homebound criteria. Methods: A scoping review of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest (grey literature) and hand-searching of the citation list was conducted up to February 2026. The study protocol was prospectively registered. Reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: We screened 2834 records (initial and updated searches) and 64 studies published between 1990 and 2026 were included. Eligibility criteria varied substantially, most commonly based on cognitive status, functional dependency, or frailty, though inconsistently defined. Homebound status was rarely reported (11 studies). Applying a classification framework developed for this review, an additional six studies were classified as possibly homebound and 27 studies as at-risk of homebound, without being labelled as such, a pattern extending beyond frailty-related groups to psychosocially vulnerable and general older populations. Conclusions: Eligibility criteria for home-based care are inconsistently defined and reported. Homebound status is rarely reported, even in populations that appear to meet homebound or at-risk criteria. Future research should examine whether a validated primary care screening tool can identify homebound risk earlier.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Hellenic Air Force (GR), Hellenic Airforce General Hospital (GR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon