Constrained autonomy in EU external action: allied institutional hedging and the private compliance veto under US extraterritorial sanctions

This article examines why EU legal and institutional measures intended to preserve lawful economic engagement with Iran failed to convert formal policy autonomy into effective external action after the United States ceased participation in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and reimposed previously lifted or waived Iran sanctions. It develops allied institutional hedging to describe legal, financial and infrastructural safeguards constructed by an aligned actor that remains embedded in a dominant partner’s networks while seeking to preserve selected policy options. Using within-case process tracing, the article shows that the Blocking Statute, INSTEX and financial-resilience agenda generated institutional mobilization but not effective autonomy. A private compliance veto emerged as firms, banks and intermediaries valued access to US markets, dollar finance and correspondent-banking networks over protected Iran-related activity. The article contributes to European integration research by explaining how EU external action is constrained through market-mediated private compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2753502
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constrained autonomy in EU external action: allied institutional hedging and the private compliance veto under US extraterritorial sanctions

Chigozie OKONKWO
Journal of European Integration
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Constrained autonomy in EU external action: allied institutional hedging and the private compliance veto under US extraterritorial sanctions

Chigozie OKONKWO
article en

Abstract

This article examines why EU legal and institutional measures intended to preserve lawful economic engagement with Iran failed to convert formal policy autonomy into effective external action after the United States ceased participation in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and reimposed previously lifted or waived Iran sanctions. It develops allied institutional hedging to describe legal, financial and infrastructural safeguards constructed by an aligned actor that remains embedded in a dominant partner’s networks while seeking to preserve selected policy options. Using within-case process tracing, the article shows that the Blocking Statute, INSTEX and financial-resilience agenda generated institutional mobilization but not effective autonomy. A private compliance veto emerged as firms, banks and intermediaries valued access to US markets, dollar finance and correspondent-banking networks over protected Iran-related activity. The article contributes to European integration research by explaining how EU external action is constrained through market-mediated private compliance.

Journal of European Integration
University of Nigeria (NG)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon