Making sense of green narratives on TikTok in digital communities: platformed practices of environmental communication

Introduction Social media platforms have reconfigured environmental communication, positioning green influencers as key players who translate environmental issues into narratives suited to the platform. While research has examined how these creators construct credibility and engage audiences, less attention has been given to how audiences themselves interpret and evaluate such content. This study investigates how young adults collectively make sense of environment-related content shared by Italian green influencers on TikTok, and which criteria guide their attribution of attention, credibility, and communicative legitimacy. Methods Three focus groups involving twenty-four regular TikTok users aged 19–31 discussed two contrasting videos selected from a corpus of environment-related videos published in 2025 by Italian creators. Data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Participants' evaluations developed through two relatively autonomous judgements, attentional capture and communicative legitimacy, rather than along a single evaluative continuum. Their different combinations generated four interpretive configurations: convergent evaluation, suspicious capture, sympathetic disengagement, and delegitimising rejection. Participants displayed considerable awareness of platform-specific engagement strategies, yet this awareness did not necessarily lead to disengagement. Discussion The coexistence of awareness and continued engagement suggests a form of negotiated acceptance, which we describe as a tacit pact between creators and audiences. This pact breaks down when perceived promotional intent or insufficient epistemic grounding undermines a creator's legitimacy. These results extend research on platformed credibility by showing that legitimacy judgements are relational, contextual, and continuously negotiated through social interaction, rather than fixed properties of content or individual dispositions. Ultimately, these findings show that young adults do not merely receive environmental narratives on TikTok, but collectively negotiate the conditions under which such narratives deserve to be watched and trusted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.2005694
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making sense of green narratives on TikTok in digital communities: platformed practices of environmental communication

Simone Mulargia, Raffaele Lombardi, Mael Bombaci
7 links
Frontiers in Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Making sense of green narratives on TikTok in digital communities: platformed practices of environmental communication

Simone Mulargia, Raffaele Lombardi, Mael Bombaci
article en

Abstract

Introduction Social media platforms have reconfigured environmental communication, positioning green influencers as key players who translate environmental issues into narratives suited to the platform. While research has examined how these creators construct credibility and engage audiences, less attention has been given to how audiences themselves interpret and evaluate such content. This study investigates how young adults collectively make sense of environment-related content shared by Italian green influencers on TikTok, and which criteria guide their attribution of attention, credibility, and communicative legitimacy. Methods Three focus groups involving twenty-four regular TikTok users aged 19–31 discussed two contrasting videos selected from a corpus of environment-related videos published in 2025 by Italian creators. Data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Participants' evaluations developed through two relatively autonomous judgements, attentional capture and communicative legitimacy, rather than along a single evaluative continuum. Their different combinations generated four interpretive configurations: convergent evaluation, suspicious capture, sympathetic disengagement, and delegitimising rejection. Participants displayed considerable awareness of platform-specific engagement strategies, yet this awareness did not necessarily lead to disengagement. Discussion The coexistence of awareness and continued engagement suggests a form of negotiated acceptance, which we describe as a tacit pact between creators and audiences. This pact breaks down when perceived promotional intent or insufficient epistemic grounding undermines a creator's legitimacy. These results extend research on platformed credibility by showing that legitimacy judgements are relational, contextual, and continuously negotiated through social interaction, rather than fixed properties of content or individual dispositions. Ultimately, these findings show that young adults do not merely receive environmental narratives on TikTok, but collectively negotiate the conditions under which such narratives deserve to be watched and trusted.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 11
Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon