Multi-Stakeholder Co-Evolution in Rural Solid Waste Governance in Northern China: Coupled Tripartite Evolutionary Game and System Dynamics Simulation

Effective rural household waste sorting is essential for improving living conditions and advancing rural revitalization in China. Our study develops a tripartite evolutionary game model involving government, waste collection and disposal enterprises (WCDEs), and rural households, and it integrates the model with system dynamics simulations to examine strategic evolution, equilibrium outcomes, and key influencing factors. The baseline scenario was calibrated using evidence from Inner Mongolia, official data, field interviews, and expert assessments. The results show that system evolution is jointly shaped by government regulation, WCDE implementation, and rural household participation. The government plays a critical coordinating role, while the emergence of cooperative equilibrium depends on appropriate institutional incentives and regulatory conditions. Government strategies are particularly sensitive to regulatory costs, expenditures on public awareness campaigns, and investments in supporting infrastructure. WCDE strategies are primarily influenced by additional operating costs and government-imposed rewards and penalties, with reductions in subsidies exerting a stronger effect than increases in penalties. Rural household participation is constrained by the time and economic costs of waste sorting and is encouraged mainly by government incentives, whereas subsidies provided by WCDE have only a limited effect. Overall, effective governance requires balancing incentives for stakeholder participation against implementation costs, and different subsidy–penalty combinations may generate heterogeneous strategic responses across stakeholders. Our theoretical contributions lie in explicitly modeling the publicity-cost and supporting-facility-cost-sharing mechanisms between governments and WCDEs, identifying asymmetric stakeholder responses toward incentive–penalty instruments, and providing region-calibrated simulation evidence for RSWM multi-agent governance. Practically, it offers a reference for designing differentiated incentive policies for rural solid-waste management in northern China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16212354
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Stakeholder Co-Evolution in Rural Solid Waste Governance in Northern China: Coupled Tripartite Evolutionary Game and System Dynamics Simulation

Jing Zhang, Li Jia, Guanghua Qiao, Xiaoxu Zhang
4 links
Agriculture
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Multi-Stakeholder Co-Evolution in Rural Solid Waste Governance in Northern China: Coupled Tripartite Evolutionary Game and System Dynamics Simulation

Jing Zhang, Li Jia, Guanghua Qiao, Xiaoxu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Effective rural household waste sorting is essential for improving living conditions and advancing rural revitalization in China. Our study develops a tripartite evolutionary game model involving government, waste collection and disposal enterprises (WCDEs), and rural households, and it integrates the model with system dynamics simulations to examine strategic evolution, equilibrium outcomes, and key influencing factors. The baseline scenario was calibrated using evidence from Inner Mongolia, official data, field interviews, and expert assessments. The results show that system evolution is jointly shaped by government regulation, WCDE implementation, and rural household participation. The government plays a critical coordinating role, while the emergence of cooperative equilibrium depends on appropriate institutional incentives and regulatory conditions. Government strategies are particularly sensitive to regulatory costs, expenditures on public awareness campaigns, and investments in supporting infrastructure. WCDE strategies are primarily influenced by additional operating costs and government-imposed rewards and penalties, with reductions in subsidies exerting a stronger effect than increases in penalties. Rural household participation is constrained by the time and economic costs of waste sorting and is encouraged mainly by government incentives, whereas subsidies provided by WCDE have only a limited effect. Overall, effective governance requires balancing incentives for stakeholder participation against implementation costs, and different subsidy–penalty combinations may generate heterogeneous strategic responses across stakeholders. Our theoretical contributions lie in explicitly modeling the publicity-cost and supporting-facility-cost-sharing mechanisms between governments and WCDEs, identifying asymmetric stakeholder responses toward incentive–penalty instruments, and providing region-calibrated simulation evidence for RSWM multi-agent governance. Practically, it offers a reference for designing differentiated incentive policies for rural solid-waste management in northern China.

AgricultureVol. 16(21)
Griffith University (AU), Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon