Cost–benefit analysis of a mobile community-based electronic medical record system for community differentiated HIV service delivery in Lilongwe, Malawi

Community-based differentiated service delivery (DSD) models are critical for sustaining high-quality HIV care in resource-limited settings. However, these models often rely on labor-intensive documentation processes that reduce efficiency. The Community-based ART Retention and Suppression (CARES) app, a tablet-based electronic medical record system designed through a human-centered design process, was developed to extend Malawi’s national electronic medical record system into community settings used by Lighthouse Trust’s nurse-led community ART program (NCAP). This study evaluated the cost–benefit of implementing CARES within NCAP. A cost–benefit analysis was conducted from the payer perspective, using data from a time–motion study of NCAP nurses and staff observed before and after CARES implementation. Observations were collected over 28 days between 2022 and 2024. Costs included one-time development, equipment, and training expenses, and annual maintenance costs. Benefits included annual time savings for healthcare workers and reduced documentation errors. All costs were converted to USD, discounted at 5%, and modeled over a 10-year horizon. Outcomes included present value (PV), net present value (NPV), benefit–cost ratio (BCR), and break-even benefit. CARES reduced total time spent on observed NCAP tasks from 8 h and 9 min pre-implementation to 4 h and 23 min post-implementation. Annual benefits totaled approximately $7,100, primarily from nurse time savings. The 10-year present value (PV) of benefits was $54,847, compared with PV costs of $46,809, yielding a net present value of $8,038 and a benefit–cost ratio of 1.17. CARES exceeded the annual benefit required for cost-neutrality by approximately $1,041, indicating a positive economic return under routine implementation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed meaningful uncertainty, with CARES exceeding break-even in approximately 68% of simulations. CARES substantially reduced the time required for healthcare worker documentation within a routine community-based DSD model and cost-beneficial over 10 years. These efficiency gains create additional capacity for patient care and may reinforce the platform’s operational sustainability. Continued evaluation is needed to quantify clinical and system-wide benefits beyond time savings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15892-2
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost–benefit analysis of a mobile community-based electronic medical record system for community differentiated HIV service delivery in Lilongwe, Malawi

Caryl Feldacker, Christine Kiruthu-Kamamia, Jacqueline Madalitso Huwa, Wim N. J. Groot et al.
1 links
BMC Health Services Research
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Cost–benefit analysis of a mobile community-based electronic medical record system for community differentiated HIV service delivery in Lilongwe, Malawi

Caryl Feldacker, Christine Kiruthu-Kamamia, Jacqueline Madalitso Huwa, Wim N. J. Groot, Hannock M. Tweya, Milena Pavlova, Hiwot Weldemariam, Agnes Thawani, Sam Truwa, Danneck Kathumba
article en

Abstract

Community-based differentiated service delivery (DSD) models are critical for sustaining high-quality HIV care in resource-limited settings. However, these models often rely on labor-intensive documentation processes that reduce efficiency. The Community-based ART Retention and Suppression (CARES) app, a tablet-based electronic medical record system designed through a human-centered design process, was developed to extend Malawi’s national electronic medical record system into community settings used by Lighthouse Trust’s nurse-led community ART program (NCAP). This study evaluated the cost–benefit of implementing CARES within NCAP. A cost–benefit analysis was conducted from the payer perspective, using data from a time–motion study of NCAP nurses and staff observed before and after CARES implementation. Observations were collected over 28 days between 2022 and 2024. Costs included one-time development, equipment, and training expenses, and annual maintenance costs. Benefits included annual time savings for healthcare workers and reduced documentation errors. All costs were converted to USD, discounted at 5%, and modeled over a 10-year horizon. Outcomes included present value (PV), net present value (NPV), benefit–cost ratio (BCR), and break-even benefit. CARES reduced total time spent on observed NCAP tasks from 8 h and 9 min pre-implementation to 4 h and 23 min post-implementation. Annual benefits totaled approximately $7,100, primarily from nurse time savings. The 10-year present value (PV) of benefits was $54,847, compared with PV costs of $46,809, yielding a net present value of $8,038 and a benefit–cost ratio of 1.17. CARES exceeded the annual benefit required for cost-neutrality by approximately $1,041, indicating a positive economic return under routine implementation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed meaningful uncertainty, with CARES exceeding break-even in approximately 68% of simulations. CARES substantially reduced the time required for healthcare worker documentation within a routine community-based DSD model and cost-beneficial over 10 years. These efficiency gains create additional capacity for patient care and may reinforce the platform’s operational sustainability. Continued evaluation is needed to quantify clinical and system-wide benefits beyond time savings.

BMC Health Services Research
University of Washington (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Lighthouse Trust (MW), Care and Public Health Research Institute (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon