The Political Economy of Heterogeneous Generative-Relational Subjects: A Preliminary Discussion

The political-economic relations of heterogeneous human, artificial, and nonhuman participants raise questions about the production and control of conditions under which distinct forms of activity remain possible. Systems capable of similar observable performance may depend on substantially different histories, infrastructures, material processes, interpretive resources, and institutional authorities. This preliminary discussion develops a generative-relational perspective for analyzing such differences alongside asymmetries in economic and normative power. It proposes to distinguish productive capability from discretion over another participant’s feasible practices, the circulation of value from control over its conditions, and stable rule compliance from legitimate rule-making authority. Human–AI relations offer a concrete focus, while multispecies arrangements and hypothetical extraterrestrial encounters serve as bounded comparative cases. The inquiry draws selectively on existing political economy, institutional analysis, generative justice, artificial agency, and multispecies scholarship. It sketches a programme of conceptual comparison and empirically discriminating research without attributing consciousness or moral personhood to present AI systems, postulating a common utility scale, or establishing general laws of generativity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/xwhtk-11043
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Economy of Heterogeneous Generative-Relational Subjects: A Preliminary Discussion

Wanhong HUANG
2 links
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Political Economy of Heterogeneous Generative-Relational Subjects: A Preliminary Discussion

Wanhong HUANG
article en

Abstract

The political-economic relations of heterogeneous human, artificial, and nonhuman participants raise questions about the production and control of conditions under which distinct forms of activity remain possible. Systems capable of similar observable performance may depend on substantially different histories, infrastructures, material processes, interpretive resources, and institutional authorities. This preliminary discussion develops a generative-relational perspective for analyzing such differences alongside asymmetries in economic and normative power. It proposes to distinguish productive capability from discretion over another participant’s feasible practices, the circulation of value from control over its conditions, and stable rule compliance from legitimate rule-making authority. Human–AI relations offer a concrete focus, while multispecies arrangements and hypothetical extraterrestrial encounters serve as bounded comparative cases. The inquiry draws selectively on existing political economy, institutional analysis, generative justice, artificial agency, and multispecies scholarship. It sketches a programme of conceptual comparison and empirically discriminating research without attributing consciousness or moral personhood to present AI systems, postulating a common utility scale, or establishing general laws of generativity.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon