The double-edged sword effect of government subsidy policy on enterprises innovation: evidence from China

This study examines the impact of ‘Specialized, Sophisticated, Unique and New’ Little Giant Enterprises government direct subsidy policy on firms’ innovation quantity and quality in China. Based on the data of 22,330 Chinese A-share listed firms from 2014 to 2024, this paper reveals that although this government subsidy policy generates positive effects on the quantity of firms’ innovation, it exerts negative influences on the innovation quality simultaneously and only boosts the innovation quantity in developed regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that the implementation of government direct subsidy policy decreases innovation quality through cutting R&D expenditure per R&D staff, while it also boosts innovation quantity through raising R&D investment intensity. This study further explores the spatial spillover effects of this subsidy policy by using spatial causal inference. The results indicate that this subsidy policy also generates significant positive spillover effects on innovation quantity and negative spillover effects on innovation quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2753034
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The double-edged sword effect of government subsidy policy on enterprises innovation: evidence from China

Minzhi Sun, Yulin Zhu
4 links
Applied Economics
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The double-edged sword effect of government subsidy policy on enterprises innovation: evidence from China

Minzhi Sun, Yulin Zhu
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of ‘Specialized, Sophisticated, Unique and New’ Little Giant Enterprises government direct subsidy policy on firms’ innovation quantity and quality in China. Based on the data of 22,330 Chinese A-share listed firms from 2014 to 2024, this paper reveals that although this government subsidy policy generates positive effects on the quantity of firms’ innovation, it exerts negative influences on the innovation quality simultaneously and only boosts the innovation quantity in developed regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that the implementation of government direct subsidy policy decreases innovation quality through cutting R&D expenditure per R&D staff, while it also boosts innovation quantity through raising R&D investment intensity. This study further explores the spatial spillover effects of this subsidy policy by using spatial causal inference. The results indicate that this subsidy policy also generates significant positive spillover effects on innovation quantity and negative spillover effects on innovation quality.

Applied Economics
Nanjing University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon