Beyond “Racialized Citizenship”: A Historical Materialist Approach to the Study of Race and Citizenship

Analyses of citizenship and race commonly treat them as independent axes of domination which somehow influence one another, leading to a proliferation of scholarship on “racialized citizenship” or “racialized illegality.” A historical-materialist approach instead situates both within the capitalist social totality and treats them as shifting apparatuses for organizing exploitation and legitimating inequality. In the United States, race-thinking emerged to naturalize slavery and to fragment an initially heterogeneous laboring population; citizenship later generalized and refined this work through liberal-legal forms that sought to reconcile formal equality with class domination. This paper analyzes how what I term the race regime prepared the terrain on which the citizenship regime could emerge. The result is a dialectical account of citizenship as a mechanism of capitalist accumulation that cannot be reduced to race, yet cannot be understood apart from it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Society
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237261464922
Primary Topic
Race, History, and American Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond “Racialized Citizenship”: A Historical Materialist Approach to the Study of Race and Citizenship

Salvador Rangel
Science & Society
Race, History, and American Society
article

Beyond “Racialized Citizenship”: A Historical Materialist Approach to the Study of Race and Citizenship

Salvador Rangel
article en

Abstract

Analyses of citizenship and race commonly treat them as independent axes of domination which somehow influence one another, leading to a proliferation of scholarship on “racialized citizenship” or “racialized illegality.” A historical-materialist approach instead situates both within the capitalist social totality and treats them as shifting apparatuses for organizing exploitation and legitimating inequality. In the United States, race-thinking emerged to naturalize slavery and to fragment an initially heterogeneous laboring population; citizenship later generalized and refined this work through liberal-legal forms that sought to reconcile formal equality with class domination. This paper analyzes how what I term the race regime prepared the terrain on which the citizenship regime could emerge. The result is a dialectical account of citizenship as a mechanism of capitalist accumulation that cannot be reduced to race, yet cannot be understood apart from it.

Science & Society
Swarthmore College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Race, History, and American Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon