Plant Growth Regulators, Biostimulants and Growth‐Promoting Microorganisms in Miscanthus : A Scoping Review of Evidence, Experimental Designs and Research Gaps (2010–2025)

ABSTRACT Miscanthus is a leading lignocellulosic crop for low‐carbon bioenergy systems, yet its deployment is limited by establishment challenges, early‐stage growth variability and performance constraints on marginal or contaminated soils. Plant growth regulators (PGRs), biostimulants (BS), and growth‐promoting microorganisms (GPMs) have been proposed to enhance establishment and stress tolerance, but evidence remains fragmented across species, environments, and application strategies. This scoping review systematically mapped peer‐reviewed experimental studies published between 2010 and 2025, following PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. Searches across Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed identified 252 records, of which 29 met the inclusion criteria after screening and deduplication. Data extraction captured species, planting material, growth environment, soil context, intervention class, application strategy, outcome domains and effect direction. The evidence base was dominated by Miscanthus × giganteus (52% of studies), rhizome‐based planting material, controlled environments and short‐duration experiments. GPMs and BS were the most frequently tested interventions, occurring in approximately 93% of studies. Growth outcomes were assessed in 26 of the 29 studies and were predominantly positive. Across studies reporting comparable data, the best‐performing treatments produced increases in above‐ground biomass ranging from approximately 15% to 200% relative to controls, while shoot‐height responses ranged from negligible effects to increases exceeding 100%. Photosynthesis‐related parameters, including photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll, also showed variable but generally positive responses. However, physiological and remediation outcomes were less consistently assessed and exhibited greater heterogeneity. The review highlights substantial methodological clustering and identifies critical gaps in long‐term field studies, seed‐ and plug‐based systems, and integrated physiological–remediation assessments needed to support scalable, net‐zero‐aligned Miscanthus deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70188
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant Growth Regulators, Biostimulants and Growth‐Promoting Microorganisms in Miscanthus : A Scoping Review of Evidence, Experimental Designs and Research Gaps (2010–2025)

Joseph Obaje, Jason Kam, Michał Mos, Danny Awty‐Carroll et al.
1 links
GCB Bioenergy
Bioenergy crop production and management
article

Plant Growth Regulators, Biostimulants and Growth‐Promoting Microorganisms in Miscanthus : A Scoping Review of Evidence, Experimental Designs and Research Gaps (2010–2025)

Joseph Obaje, Jason Kam, Michał Mos, Danny Awty‐Carroll, Rachael C. Symonds, R. Webster, Ekele Jiata Ugwah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Miscanthus is a leading lignocellulosic crop for low‐carbon bioenergy systems, yet its deployment is limited by establishment challenges, early‐stage growth variability and performance constraints on marginal or contaminated soils. Plant growth regulators (PGRs), biostimulants (BS), and growth‐promoting microorganisms (GPMs) have been proposed to enhance establishment and stress tolerance, but evidence remains fragmented across species, environments, and application strategies. This scoping review systematically mapped peer‐reviewed experimental studies published between 2010 and 2025, following PRISMA‐ScR guidelines. Searches across Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed identified 252 records, of which 29 met the inclusion criteria after screening and deduplication. Data extraction captured species, planting material, growth environment, soil context, intervention class, application strategy, outcome domains and effect direction. The evidence base was dominated by Miscanthus × giganteus (52% of studies), rhizome‐based planting material, controlled environments and short‐duration experiments. GPMs and BS were the most frequently tested interventions, occurring in approximately 93% of studies. Growth outcomes were assessed in 26 of the 29 studies and were predominantly positive. Across studies reporting comparable data, the best‐performing treatments produced increases in above‐ground biomass ranging from approximately 15% to 200% relative to controls, while shoot‐height responses ranged from negligible effects to increases exceeding 100%. Photosynthesis‐related parameters, including photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll, also showed variable but generally positive responses. However, physiological and remediation outcomes were less consistently assessed and exhibited greater heterogeneity. The review highlights substantial methodological clustering and identifies critical gaps in long‐term field studies, seed‐ and plug‐based systems, and integrated physiological–remediation assessments needed to support scalable, net‐zero‐aligned Miscanthus deployment.

GCB BioenergyVol. 18(12)
Translational Research Institute (AU), Aberystwyth University (GB), Merseytravel (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Liverpool John Moores University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bioenergy crop production and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon