A comparative study of the effect of early versus late dynamization of external fixator in the treatment of compound fracture of tibia: a non-randomized controlled trial

Background: Dynamization is commonly employed to enhance fracture healing following stabilization with external fixators or intramedullary nails. However, the optimal timing of dynamization remains controversial, with limited consensus in clinical practice. The aim was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of early versus late dynamization in patients with tibial fractures treated using external fixation and to determine the optimal timing for dynamization. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 36 patients with open tibial fractures managed with external fixation. Patients were equally divided into two groups: group I (early dynamization, initiated at 2-4 weeks postoperatively) and group II (late dynamization, initiated at or after 4 weeks). Patients were followed up for fracture union, time to union, complications, pain, range of motion, need for secondary procedures, and functional outcome using the Baird and Jackson scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Fracture union was achieved in 94.4% of patients in the early dynamization group compared to 72.2% in the late dynamization group. The mean time to union was significantly shorter in group I (12.65±5.49 weeks) than in group II (18.46±4.61 weeks; p=0.005). Complication rates, including pin tract infection and limb shortening, were lower in the early dynamization group. Functional outcomes were favorable in both groups; however, excellent Baird and Jackson scores were more frequent in the early dynamization group. Pain relief and restoration of joint range of motion were achieved earlier in patients undergoing early dynamization. Conclusions: Early dynamization within four weeks of surgery results in faster fracture union and better functional outcomes compared to late dynamization. Early dynamization should be considered the preferred strategy in the management of tibial fractures treated with external fixation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20263906
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of the effect of early versus late dynamization of external fixator in the treatment of compound fracture of tibia: a non-randomized controlled trial

Sanjib Waikhom, Bojum Leya, Hemam Chittaranjan Singh, Vikash Kumar
International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics
Bone fractures and treatments
article

A comparative study of the effect of early versus late dynamization of external fixator in the treatment of compound fracture of tibia: a non-randomized controlled trial

Sanjib Waikhom, Bojum Leya, Hemam Chittaranjan Singh, Vikash Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Dynamization is commonly employed to enhance fracture healing following stabilization with external fixators or intramedullary nails. However, the optimal timing of dynamization remains controversial, with limited consensus in clinical practice. The aim was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of early versus late dynamization in patients with tibial fractures treated using external fixation and to determine the optimal timing for dynamization. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 36 patients with open tibial fractures managed with external fixation. Patients were equally divided into two groups: group I (early dynamization, initiated at 2-4 weeks postoperatively) and group II (late dynamization, initiated at or after 4 weeks). Patients were followed up for fracture union, time to union, complications, pain, range of motion, need for secondary procedures, and functional outcome using the Baird and Jackson scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Fracture union was achieved in 94.4% of patients in the early dynamization group compared to 72.2% in the late dynamization group. The mean time to union was significantly shorter in group I (12.65±5.49 weeks) than in group II (18.46±4.61 weeks; p=0.005). Complication rates, including pin tract infection and limb shortening, were lower in the early dynamization group. Functional outcomes were favorable in both groups; however, excellent Baird and Jackson scores were more frequent in the early dynamization group. Pain relief and restoration of joint range of motion were achieved earlier in patients undergoing early dynamization. Conclusions: Early dynamization within four weeks of surgery results in faster fracture union and better functional outcomes compared to late dynamization. Early dynamization should be considered the preferred strategy in the management of tibial fractures treated with external fixation.

International Journal of Research in OrthopaedicsVol. 12(6)
Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon